This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Stone, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Stone, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 72, Issue 9 1307-1315, Copyright © 1990 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Measurement of anterior-posterior displacement of the knee. A comparison of the results with instrumented devices and with clinical examination

ME Steiner, C Brown, B Zarins, B Brownstein, PS Koval and P Stone
Harvard Community Health Plan, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.

Thirteen subjects who had normal knees and fifteen patients who had a chronic rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament were tested in order to compare the measurements of tibiofemoral displacement as recorded by four commercial devices: the Acufex knee-signature system, the Genucom knee-analysis system, the Medmetric KT-1000 arthrometer, and the Stryker knee-laxity tester. Anterior and posterior displacement were measured at forces of eighty-nine newtons (twenty pounds) and 133 newtons (thirty pounds). We found significant differences in reproducibility of measurement among the devices. The Acufex, Medmetric, and Stryker devices had more reproducible measurements, and they could be used to identify 80 to 90 per cent of the normal subjects and anterior cruciate-deficient patients. The Genucom device had poorer reproducibility of measurement, and it tended to register greater differences in displacement between the right and left knees of normal subjects.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
V. Chouliaras, S. Ristanis, C. Moraiti, N. Stergiou, and A. D. Georgoulis
Effectiveness of Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament With Quadrupled Hamstrings and Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autografts: An In Vivo Study Comparing Tibial Internal-External Rotation
Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2007; 35(2): 189 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
S. L. Rozzi, S. M. Lephart, W. S. Gear, and F. H. Fu
Knee Joint Laxity and Neuromuscular Characteristics of Male and Female Soccer and Basketball Players
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 1999; 27(3): 312 - 319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
F. E. Huber, J. J. Irrgang, C. Harner, and S. Lephart
Intratester and Intertester Reliability of the KT-1000 Arthrometer in the Assessment of Posterior Laxity of the Knee
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1997; 25(4): 479 - 485.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
J. W. Myrer, S. S. Schulthies, and G. W. Fellingham
Relative and Absolute Reliability of the KT-2000 Arthrometer for Uninjured Knees: Testing at 67, 89, 134, and 178 N and Manual Maximum Forces
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1996; 24(1): 104 - 108.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. R. Bach JR, G. T. Jones, C. A. Hager, F. A. Sweet, and S. Luergans
Arthrometric Results of Arthroscopically Assisted Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction using Autograft Patellar Tendon Substitution
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1995; 23(2): 179 - 185.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
D. M. Daniel, M. L. Stone, B. E. Dobson, D. C. Fithian, D. J. Rossman, and K. R. Kaufman
Fate of the ACL-injured Patient: A Prospective Outcome Study
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 1994; 22(5): 632 - 644.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
L. Good, M. Odensten, and J. Gillquist
Sagittal Knee Stability After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with a Patellar Tendon Strip: A Two-year Follow-up Study
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1994; 22(4): 518 - 523.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. A. Oberlander, R. M. Shalvoy, and J. C. Hughston
The accuracy of the clinical knee examination documented by arthroscopy: A prospective study
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1993; 21(6): 773 - 778.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
D. L. Kowalk, E. M. Wojtys, J. Disher, and P. Loubert
Quantitative analysis of the measuring capabilities of the KT-1000 knee ligament arthrometer
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 1993; 21(5): 744 - 747.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
C. L. Highgenboten, A. W. Jackson, K. A. Jansson, and N. B. Meske
KT-1000 arthrometer: Conscious and unconscious test results using 15, 20, and 30 pounds of force
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1992; 20(4): 450 - 454.
[Abstract] [PDF]