This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yadav, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yadav, S. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 72, Issue 4 486-494, Copyright © 1990 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Dual-fibular grafting for massive bone gaps in the lower extremity

SS Yadav
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.

Fifty-two patients who had a tumor in the lower extremity (thirty-seven, a giant-cell tumor and fifteen, a small osteosarcoma that had not metastasized) had dual-fibular strut-grafting to bridge the osseous gap resulting from excision of the tumor. The size of the gap ranged from nine to twenty-four centimeters. The average time until union ranged from ten to twenty months. The ipsilateral fibula was used in thirty-six patients and both fibulae, in the remaining sixteen patients. Immediate reimplantation and adequate fixation of the fibular graft to the proximal and distal ends of the bone to be grafted, along with placement of a cuff of cancellous bone at the host-graft junction and between the fibular struts, fostered early union of the graft to the host bone. Insertion of Kirschner wires inside these long grafts helped to maintain continuity of the graft when a stress fracture occurred. Eight patients who had a non-union at one of the host-graft sites and three who had a stress fracture had subsequent cancellous bone-grafting to obtain union. Superficial infection was the most common complication and was seen in seventeen patients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
C. W. B. Steinlechner and N. C. Mkandawire
Non-vascularised fibular transfer in the management of defects of long bones after sequestrectomy in children
J Bone Joint Surg Br, September 1, 2005; 87-B(9): 1259 - 1263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. J. LEWIS, J. H. HEALEY, A. G. HUVOS, and M. BURT
Benign Giant-Cell Tumor of Bone with Metastasis to Mediastinal Lymph Nodes. A Case Report of Resection Facilitated with Use of steroids
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 1996; 78(1): 106 - 10.
[Full Text]