This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manaster, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bell, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manaster, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bell, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 72, Issue 3 409-414, Copyright © 1990 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Magnetic resonance imaging of vascular anatomy before vascularized fibular grafting

BJ Manaster, DA Coleman and DA Bell
Department of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

Magnetic resonance images of the leg were made preoperatively to show the vascular anatomy in twenty-nine patients (thirty-five legs) who were between the ages of fourteen and forty-one years and in whom we planned to use the fibula as a vascular graft. The fibula was harvested as a graft in thirty-two legs, and this allowed us to compare the images with the anatomical findings at operation. In these thirty-two legs, the branching pattern, the measured distance to the bifurcation of the peroneal artery, and all vascular anomalies in the area were accurately detected. No graft was taken from the other three legs. We recommend that imaging of the vascular anatomy of the leg be done before using the fibula as a vascular graft in order to detect the precise point of origin of the peroneal artery from the posterior tibial artery, to estimate the length of the vascular pedicle, and to evaluate the role of the three major vessels in supplying blood to the leg. All these aims can be accomplished with the aid of angiography, but we have found that gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state (GRASS) magnetic-resonance imaging is more cost-effective and is associated with less morbidity. It is not adequate for older patients who have arterial stenosis or atherosclerosis or for patients who have some other underlying vascular disease. Metallic hardware may cause artefacts that obscure the vascular anatomy.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. C. Chow, A. Napoli, M. B. Klein, J. Chang, and G. D. Rubin
Vascular Mapping of the Leg with Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography prior to Free-Flap Transplantation
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 353 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Facial Plast SurgHome page
L. Oxford and Y. Ducic
Use of Fibula-Free Tissue Transfer With Preoperative 2-Vessel Runoff to the Lower Extremity
Arch Facial Plast Surg, July 1, 2005; 7(4): 261 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
R. B. Smith, R. D. Thomas, and G. F. Funk
Fibula Free Flaps: The Role of Angiography in Patients With Abnormal Results on Preoperative Color Flow Doppler Studies
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, July 1, 2003; 129(7): 712 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]