This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kudo, H.
Right arrow Articles by Iwano, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kudo, H.
Right arrow Articles by Iwano, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 72, Issue 3 355-362, Copyright © 1990 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Total elbow arthroplasty with a non-constrained surface-replacement prosthesis in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. A long-term follow-up study

H Kudo and K Iwano
Orthopaedic Section, Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan.

Thirty-seven elbows in thirty-six patients who had rheumatoid arthritis had a total elbow arthroplasty with insertion of a non-constrained surface-replacement prosthesis. The patients were followed for an average of nine years and six months, the longest follow-up being seventeen years. A good result was seen in twenty-nine elbows; a fair result, in one; and a poor result, in seven. The reasons for the poor results were gross posterior displacement of the humeral component in five elbows, persistent subluxation with pain in one, and recurrent ankylosis in one. Of the five elbows that had gross posterior displacement, four had a revision operation with a new humeral component, and a satisfactory result was eventually achieved. Radiographic examination revealed various degrees of proximal subsidence of the humeral component in 70 per cent of the elbows. However, in most of the elbows the subsidence was not progressive and was compatible with a good clinical result. In contrast, the rate of loosening of the ulnar component was low; loosening was seen in only 5 per cent of the elbows. Seventeen elbows were followed for ten years or more, and comparison of the clinical results in the intermediate period with those at the most recent review revealed that the results improved with time. Because of the number of elbows in which subsidence of the humeral component developed, we now use a humeral component with an intramedullary stem, and were no longer recommend the use of our Type-1 and Type-2 prostheses.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
N. Tanaka, H. Sakahashi, S. Ishii, and H. Kudo
Comparison of two types of ulnar component in type-5 Kudo total elbow arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP
J Bone Joint Surg Br, March 1, 2006; 88-B(3): 341 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
C. P. Little, A. J. Graham, and A. J. Carr
Total elbow arthroplasty: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE UNTIL THE END OF 2003
J Bone Joint Surg Br, April 1, 2005; 87-B(4): 437 - 444.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
A. Whaley, B. F. Morrey, and R. Adams
Total elbow arthroplasty after previous resection of the radial head and synovectomy
J Bone Joint Surg Br, January 1, 2005; 87-B(1): 47 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
J. I. Kauffman, A. L. Chen, S. Stuchin, and P. E. Di Cesare
Surgical Management of the Rheumatoid Elbow
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., March 1, 2003; 11(2): 100 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
N. Tanaka, H. Kudo, K. Iwano, H. Sakahashi, E. Sato, and S. Ishii
Kudo Total Elbow Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis : A Long-Term Follow-up Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2001; 83(10): 1506 - 1513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. Mansat and B. F. Morrey
Semiconstrained Total Elbow Arthroplasty for Ankylosed and Stiff Elbows
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2000; 82(9): 1260 - 1260.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
H. KUDO, K. IWANO, and J. NISHINO
Total Elbow Arthroplasty with Use of a Nonconstrained Humeral Component Inserted without Cement in Patients Who Have Rheumatoid Arthritis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 1999; 81(9): 1268 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. M. CONNOR and B. F. MORREY
Total Elbow Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 1998; 80(5): 678 - 88.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
E. H. SCHEMITSCH, F. C. EWALD, and T. S. THORNHILL
Results of Total Elbow Arthroplasty after Excision of the Radial Head and Synovectomy in Patients Who Had Rheumatoid Arthritis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 1996; 78(10): 1541 - 7.
[Abstract] [Full Text]