This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carman, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Birch, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carman, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Birch, J. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 72, Issue 3 328-333, Copyright © 1990 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation

DL Carman, RH Browne and JG Birch
Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Crippled Children, Dallas 75219.

Interobserver variations for measurements of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who had kyphosis were comparable with those on the radiographs of patients who had scoliosis. Four staff orthopaedists and one physical therapist measured eight radiographs that showed scoliosis and twenty that showed kyphosis. The measurements were made on two occasions and in random order. For scoliosis, the average difference between readings was 3.8 degrees, and 95 per cent of the differences were 8 degrees or less (range, 0 to 10 degrees). These findings were in keeping with those of other published reports. For kyphosis, the average difference between readings was 3.3 degrees, and 95 per cent of the differences were 7 degrees or less (range, 0 to 30 degrees). One investigator rated the kyphosis radiographs with respect to clarity. There was a trend to less variation with clearer radiographs, but this was not significant. The end-vertebrae were pre-selected for some radiographs and were freely chosen by the interpreter for others. Reliability was not significantly improved when the end-vertebrae of the curve had been pre-selected. Using the statistical method called tolerance limits, we determined that if one were to be 95 per cent confident that a measured difference represented a true change, the difference would have to be 10 degrees for scoliosis radiographs and 11 degrees for kyphosis radiographs. The probability that a measured difference is due to measurement error alone (that is, a false-positive reading) was calculated.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
A. M Briggs, J. H van Dieen, T. V Wrigley, A. M Greig, B. Phillips, S. K. Lo, and K. L Bennell
Thoracic Kyphosis Affects Spinal Loads and Trunk Muscle Force
Physical Therapy, May 1, 2007; 87(5): 595 - 607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. Geijer, K.-W. Beckman, B. Jonsson, T. Andersson, and J. Persliden
Digital Radiography of Scoliosis with a Scanning Method: Initial Evaluation
Radiology, February 1, 2001; 218(2): 402 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
F. , R. , J. , , , E. , and C.
Measurement Accuracy in Congenital
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2001; 83(1): 42 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. G. Little, K. M. Song, D. Katz, and J. A. Herring
Relationship of Peak Height Velocity to Other Maturity Indicators in Idiopathic Scoliosis in Girls
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2000; 82(5): 685 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
S. Goh, R. I. Price, P. J. Leedman, and K. P. Singer
A comparison of three methods for measuring thoracic kyphosis: implications for clinical studies
Rheumatology, March 1, 2000; 39(3): 310 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. P. Tripathi, M. G. Massad, V. K. Mehta, E. Benedetti, and A. S. Geha
Pneumothorax necessitans presenting as a presternal pneumothoracocele
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2000; 69(1): 266 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
L. G. LENKE, K. H. BRIDWELL, K. BLANKE, C. BALDUS, and J. WESTON
Radiographic Results of Arthrodesis with Cotrel-Dubousset Instrumentation for the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. A Five to Ten-Year Follow-up Study*{{dagger}}
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 1998; 80(6): 807 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. BERNSTEIN
Current Concepts Review - Decision Analysis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 1997; 79(9): 1404 - 14.
[Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. B. Winter, J. E. Lonstein, K. J. Noonan, S. L. Weinstein, W. C. Jacobson, and L. A. Dolan
Correspondence
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 1997; 79(6): 954-a - 5.
[Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. J. STIRLING, D. HOWEL, P. A. MILLNER, S.'A SADIQ, D. SHARPLES, and R. A. DICKSON
Late-Onset Idiopathic Scoliosis in Children Six to Fourteen Years Old. A Cross-Sectional Prevalence Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 1996; 78(9): 1330 - 6.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
N. J. ALLINGTON and J. R. BOWEN
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Treatment with the Wilmington Brace. A Comparison of Full-Time and Part-Time Use
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 1996; 78(7): 1056 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. C. Lin, S. R. Miller, and A. B. Gazzaniga
Primary Sternal Osteomyelitis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 1996; 61(1): 225 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
R. P. Grelsamer, C. S. Proctor, and A. N. Bazos
Evaluation of Patellar Shape in the Sagittal Plane: A Clinical Analysis
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1994; 22(1): 61 - 66.
[Abstract] [PDF]