This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morrissy, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Cowie, G. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morrissy, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Cowie, G. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 72, Issue 3 320-327, Copyright © 1990 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error

RT Morrissy, GS Goldsmith, EC Hall, D Kehl and GH Cowie
Scottish Rite Children's Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia 30363.

To quantitate the intrinsic error in measurement, fifty anteroposterior radiographs of patients who had scoliosis were each measured on six separate occasions by four orthopaedic surgeons using the Cobb method. For the first two measurements (Set I), each observer selected the end-vertebrae of the curve; for the next two measurements (Set II), the end-vertebrae were pre-selected and constant. The last two measurements (Set III) were obtained in the same manner as Set II, except that each examiner used the same protractor rather than the one that he carried with him. The pooled results of all four observers suggested that the 95 per cent confidence limit for intraobserver variability was 4.9 degrees for Set I, 3.8 degrees for Set II, and 2.8 degrees for Set III. The interobserver variability was 7.2 degrees for Set I and 6.3 degrees for Sets II and III. The mean angles differed significantly between observers, but the difference was smaller when the observers used the same protractor.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. R. Davids, E. Chamberlin, and D. W. Blackhurst
Indications for Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Presumed Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2004; 86(10): 2187 - 2195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
B. A. Alman, S. N. Raza, and W. D. Biggar
Steroid Treatment and the Development of Scoliosis in Males with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2004; 86(3): 519 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
J. M. Conrad and C. L. Stanitski
Osteochondritis Dissecans: Wilson's Sign Revisited
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2003; 31(5): 777 - 778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
V L Murrie, H Wilson, W Hollingworth, N M Antoun, and A K Dixon
Supportive cushions produce no practical reduction in lumbar lordosis
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2002; 75(894): 536 - 538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. Geijer, K.-W. Beckman, B. Jonsson, T. Andersson, and J. Persliden
Digital Radiography of Scoliosis with a Scanning Method: Initial Evaluation
Radiology, February 1, 2001; 218(2): 402 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
L. G. LENKE, K. H. BRIDWELL, K. BLANKE, C. BALDUS, and J. WESTON
Radiographic Results of Arthrodesis with Cotrel-Dubousset Instrumentation for the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. A Five to Ten-Year Follow-up Study*{{dagger}}
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 1998; 80(6): 807 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
G. A. Paletta Jr, P. A. Bednarz, C. L. Stanitski, G.A. Sandman, D. F. Stanitski, and S. Kottamasu
The Prognostic Value of Quantitative Bone Scan in Knee Osteochondritis Dissecans: A Preliminary Experience
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1998; 26(1): 7 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. BERNSTEIN
Current Concepts Review - Decision Analysis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 1997; 79(9): 1404 - 14.
[Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. B. Winter, J. E. Lonstein, K. J. Noonan, S. L. Weinstein, W. C. Jacobson, and L. A. Dolan
Correspondence
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 1997; 79(6): 954-a - 5.
[Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
N. J. ALLINGTON and J. R. BOWEN
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Treatment with the Wilmington Brace. A Comparison of Full-Time and Part-Time Use
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 1996; 78(7): 1056 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. C. SCHENCK JR. and J. M. GOODNIGHT
Current Concept Review - Osteochondritis Dissecans
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 1996; 78(3): 439 - 56.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
E. E. Berg, S. L. Mason, and M. J. Lucas
Patellar Height Ratios: A Comparison of Four Measurement Methods
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1996; 24(2): 218 - 221.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
P. A. Dowdy and S. W. O'Driscoll
Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1994; 22(4): 489 - 492.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
R. P. Grelsamer, C. S. Proctor, and A. N. Bazos
Evaluation of Patellar Shape in the Sagittal Plane: A Clinical Analysis
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1994; 22(1): 61 - 66.
[Abstract] [PDF]