This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Dyer, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Dyer, A. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 72, Issue 10 1451-1455, Copyright © 1990 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Prerandomization: an alternative to classic randomization. The effects on recruitment in a controlled trial of arthroscopy for osteoarthrosis of the knee

RW Chang, J Falconer, SD Stulberg, WJ Arnold and AR Dyer
Department of Medicine (Arthritis-Connective Tissue Diseases Section), Northwestern University Multipurpose Arthritis Center, Chicago, Illinois 60611.

Possibly the greatest threat to the success of a randomized clinical trial is the inability to recruit an adequate number of subjects. Concern that the randomized clinical trial will adversely affect the physician-patient relationship is the most common reason for physicians' reluctance to enroll patients in such trials. We report a modification of a prerandomized design, first described by Zelen, which was implemented in a randomized clinical trial of arthroscopy for patients who had osteoarthrosis of the knee. The method was associated with a sixfold increase in the rate of accrual of patients as compared with the use of a classic randomization trial. We propose the design as a potential solution to the problem of recruitment of subjects, particularly for clinical studies.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. Buckley, S. Tough, R. McCormack, G. Pate, R. Leighton, D. Petrie, and R. Galpin
Operative Compared with Nonoperative Treatment of Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures : A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Trial
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 10, 2002; 84(10): 1733 - 1744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. G. Kowall, G. Kolk, G. W. Nuber, J. E. Cassisi, and S. H. Stern
Patellar Taping in the Treatment of Patellofemoral Pain: A Prospective Randomized Study
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1996; 24(1): 61 - 66.
[Abstract] [PDF]