This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friscia, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Oppenheim, W. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Friscia, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Oppenheim, W. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 71, Issue 9 1386-1392, Copyright © 1989 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Rotational osteotomy for proximal femoral focal deficiency

DA Friscia, CF Moseley and WL Oppenheim
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center 90024.

Thirteen patients who had a proximal femoral focal deficiency and were treated with a rotational osteotomy of the tibia (Van Nes procedure) were evaluated at an average of five years after operation. Five patients needed a repeat osteotomy of the tibia: four because the limb had spontaneously derotated toward the original position and one because the limb had had insufficient rotation at the time of operation. One patient had a disarticulation at the ankle after the first stage of a planned two-stage procedure because the mother was not happy with the child's appearance. In ten limbs, the distal femoral growth plate and epiphysis were removed and in two, the femoral epiphysis and growth plate and the tibial growth plate were removed so that the joint of the prosthetic knee would be positioned at the proper height at the completion of the child's growth. Neither growth plate was removed from one limb, the shorter one in the child who had bilateral involvement. A ten-point grading scale based on use and fit of the prosthesis, gait, range of motion of the ankle, use of external support, and final height of the ankle compared with that of the contralateral knee was used to evaluate the result, which was excellent in six patients, good in four, fair in one, and poor in one. One patient, who had a disarticulation at the ankle, was excluded from the final evaluation. Rotational osteotomy provided good function and acceptable cosmetic appearance in the patients who had unilateral involvement.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. L.B. Brown
Resection, Rotationplasty, and Femoropelvic Arthrodesis in Severe Congenital Femoral Deficiency : A Report of the Surgical Technique and Three Cases
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2001; 83(1): 78 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
E. FOWLER, R. ZERNICKE, Y. SETOGUCHI, and W. OPPENHEIM
Energy Expenditure during Walking by Children Who Have Proximal Femoral Focal Deficiency
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 1996; 78(12): 1857 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text]