This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cammisa, F. P.
Right arrow Articles by Green, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cammisa, F. P.
Right arrow Articles by Green, B. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 71, Issue 7 1044-1052, Copyright © 1989 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Dural laceration occurring with burst fractures and associated laminar fractures

FP Cammisa, FJ Eismont and BA Green
University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital Center, Florida.

The cases of sixty patients in whom a burst fracture of a thoracic or lumbar vertebral body had been treated with posterior instrumentation and arthrodesis less than two weeks after the injury were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty of the patients had an associated laminar fracture. Eleven of the thirty, all of whom had a lumbar fracture and a preoperative neurological deficit, were noted at operation to have dural laceration. In four of the patients who had dural laceration, neural elements were entrapped between the fragments from the laminar fracture. None of the remaining thirty patients who did not have a laminar fracture had dural laceration (p = 0.0002). Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis revealed no significant association of the dural laceration with the patients' age or sex, or with the radiographic characteristics of the spine. There was a significant association between dural laceration and neurological deficit (p = 0.0001). In our series, the presence of a preoperative neurological deficit in a patient who had a burst fracture and an associated laminar fracture was a sensitive (100 per cent) and specific (74 per cent) predictor of dural laceration. The presence of this fracture pattern and an associated neurological deficit also predicted a risk of dural laceration with entrapped neural elements. This information may influence decisions as to whether an anterior or a posterior surgical approach should be used in such patients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
M. R. Mikles, R. P. Stchur, and G. P. Graziano
Posterior Instrumentation for Thoracolumbar Fractures
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., November 1, 2004; 12(6): 424 - 435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. C. WANG, H. H. BOHLMAN, and K. D. RIEW
Dural Tears Secondary to Operations on the Lumbar Spine. Management and Results After a Two-Year-Minimum Follow-up of Eighty-eight Patients
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 1998; 80(12): 1728 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text]