This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weiland, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weiland, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, J. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 71, Issue 2 217-222, Copyright © 1989 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Capitellocondylar total elbow replacement. A long-term follow-up study

AJ Weiland, AP Weiss, RP Wills and JR Moore
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

The results of forty total elbow replacements in which a capitellocondylar prosthesis was implanted in thirty-five patients (five of whom had a bilateral procedure) were reviewed retrospectively. The average length of follow-up was 7.2 years (range, four to twelve years). Pronation, supination, and flexion of the elbow improved considerably, but extension did not change a great deal. The average rating of the elbow, according to the scoring system of Ewald et al., improved from 30 to 88 points, but the functional score, as defined by the American Rheumatism Association, improved in only four patients. Malarticulation or dislocation of the prosthesis occurred in ten patients (29 per cent). In two other patients, a deep infection developed, necessitating removal of the prosthesis. Ten prostheses (ten patients) had radiolucent lines on follow-up radiographs, but these lines were not associated with pain or loosening. Seven patients (seven elbows) had a transient ulnar-nerve palsy. The incidence of this complication was reduced from 30 per cent (five of seventeen patients) to 15 per cent (four of twenty-eight patients) when the lateral Kocher approach to the elbow was adopted.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. Shin and D. Ring
The Ulnar Nerve in Elbow Trauma
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2007; 89(5): 1108 - 1116.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
G. S. Athwal and B. F. Morrey
Revision Total Elbow Arthroplasty for Prosthetic Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2006; 88(9): 2017 - 2026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
G. D. Gramstad and L. M. Galatz
Management of Elbow Osteoarthritis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2006; 88(2): 421 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. Ring, M. Kocher, M. Koris, and T. S. Thornhill
Revision of Unstable Capitellocondylar (Unlinked) Total Elbow Replacement
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2005; 87(5): 1075 - 1079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
C. P. Little, A. J. Graham, and A. J. Carr
Total elbow arthroplasty: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE UNTIL THE END OF 2003
J Bone Joint Surg Br, April 1, 2005; 87-B(4): 437 - 444.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
J. I. Kauffman, A. L. Chen, S. Stuchin, and P. E. Di Cesare
Surgical Management of the Rheumatoid Elbow
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., March 1, 2003; 11(2): 100 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. Mansat and B. F. Morrey
Semiconstrained Total Elbow Arthroplasty for Ankylosed and Stiff Elbows
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2000; 82(9): 1260 - 1260.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
H. KUDO, K. IWANO, and J. NISHINO
Total Elbow Arthroplasty with Use of a Nonconstrained Humeral Component Inserted without Cement in Patients Who Have Rheumatoid Arthritis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 1999; 81(9): 1268 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. J. BERRY, W. S. HARMSEN, and D. M. ILSTRUP
The Natural History of Debonding of the Femoral Component from the Cement and Its Effect on Long-Term Survival of Charnley Total Hip Replacements
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 1998; 80(5): 715 - 21.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. YAMAGUCHI, R. A. ADAMS, and B. F. MORREY
Infection after Total Elbow Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 1998; 80(4): 481 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
G. J. W. KING, R. A. ADAMS, and B. F. MORREY
Total Elbow Arthroplasty: Revision with Use of a Non-Custom Semiconstrained Prosthesis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 1997; 79(3): 394 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text]