This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deluca, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ruwe, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Deluca, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ruwe, P. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 70, Issue 9 1372-1376, Copyright © 1988 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Refracture of bones of the forearm after the removal of compression plates

PA Deluca, RW Lindsey and PA Ruwe
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510.

Of thirty-seven patients who had sixty-two diaphyseal plates removed from the forearm after fixation of a fracture, seven patients had a refracture, two of whom refractured both bones of the forearm. Six of the seven refractures were in patients who initially had had a fracture of both bones, and all were in patients in whom the original fracture had been caused by major trauma. The interval from the time of removal of the plate to refracture ranged from forty-two to 121 days. Only one of the seven patients who had a refracture had had adequate compression of the original fracture. The average interval from the time of the original trauma to internal fixation was two days in six patients who had a refracture and who originally had had primary plating, compared with 8.5 days in the patients who did not have a refracture. One of the seven patients who had a refracture had originally had delayed plating after closed treatment had failed. In retrospect, radiolucency at the site of the original fracture was seen in most patients when the plate was removed.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
F. Leung and S.-P. Chow
A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing the Limited Contact Dynamic Compression Plate with the Point Contact Fixator for Forearm Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2003; 85(12): 2343 - 2348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. M. Flynn, J. F. Sarwark, P. M. Waters, D. S. Bae, and L. Powers Lemke
The Operative Management of Pediatric Fractures of the Upper Extremity
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 12, 2002; 84(11): 2078 - 2089.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. R. RICHARDS
Current Concepts Review - Chronic Disorders of the Forearm
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 1996; 78(6): 916 - 30.
[Full Text]