This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amstutz, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Dorey, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Amstutz, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Dorey, F. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 70, Issue 8 1174-1182, Copyright © 1988 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

The Dana total shoulder arthroplasty

HC Amstutz, BJ Thomas, JM Kabo, RH Jinnah and FJ Dorey
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine 90024.

Fifty-six Dana unconstrained total shoulder arthroplasties in forty-seven patients were followed for a minimum of two years. The preoperative diagnoses included osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, traumatic arthritis, avascular necrosis, failed hemiarthroplasty, and failed total shoulder arthroplasty of another design. For all of the patients, the average rating for pain improved from 3 points preoperatively to 8 points postoperatively, and the average rating for function improved from 3 to 7 points. The ranges of abduction and of external rotation improved substantially in the shoulders that were affected by osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or osteonecrosis. Ten patients were treated with a hooded glenoid component, designed to improve stability in shoulders in which the rotator cuff is deficient. In these shoulders, both the rating for pain and the rating for function improved, although the range of motion did not. Complications that required revision of the arthroplasty developed in five shoulders in which a regular component had been implanted and in two that had a hooded glenoid component. A radiolucent line developed at the bone-cement interface of the glenoid component in fifty-three shoulders, but only two revisions were done for loosening of the glenoid component.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
K. J. Ecklund, T. Q. Lee, J. Tibone, and R. Gupta
Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., June 1, 2007; 15(6): 340 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. D. Martin, D. Zurakowski, and T. S. Thornhill
Uncemented Glenoid Component in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Survivorship and Outcomes
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2005; 87(6): 1284 - 1292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. D. Lazarus, K. L. Jensen, C. Southworth, and F. A. Matsen III
The Radiographic Evaluation of Keeled and Pegged Glenoid Component Insertion
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 9, 2002; 84(7): 1174 - 1182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
G. M. GARTSMAN, T. S. RODDEY, and S. M. HAMMERMAN
Shoulder Arthroplasty with or without Resurfacing of the Glenoid in Patients Who Have Osteoarthritis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2000; 82(1): 26 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. L. JENSEN, G. R. WILLIAMS, I. J. RUSSELL, and C. A. ROCKWOOD
Current Concepts Review - Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 1999; 81(9): 1312 - 24.
[Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. L. PEARL and S. KURUTZ
Geometric Analysis of Commonly Used Prosthetic Systems for Proximal Humeral Replacement
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 1999; 81(5): 660 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. L. WALLACE, R. L. PHILLIPS, G. A. MACDOUGAL, W. R. WALSH, and D. H. SONNABEND
Resurfacing of the Glenoid in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. A Comparison, at a Mean of Five Years, of Prostheses Inserted with and without Cement
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 1999; 81(4): 510 - 8.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. T. HAVIG, A. KUMAR, W. CARPENTER, and J. G. SEILER III
Assessment of Radiolucent Lines about the Glenoid: An In Vitro Radiographic Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 1997; 79(3): 428 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. A. WIRTH and C. A. ROCKWOOD JR.
Current Concepts Review - Complications of Total Shoulder-Replacement Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 1996; 78(4): 603 - 16.
[Full Text]