This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ertl, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by VanBuecken, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ertl, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by VanBuecken, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 70, Issue 7 967-976, Copyright © 1988 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Triplane fracture of the distal tibial epiphysis. Long-term follow-up

JP Ertl, RL Barrack, AH Alexander and K VanBuecken
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Naval Hospital, Oakland, California 94627-5000.

The cases of twenty-three patients in whom a triplane fracture had been treated at the Naval Hospital, Oakland, California, between 1974 and 1985, were reviewed. The anatomical configuration of the fracture was confirmed in fifteen patients. Eleven of the fifteen patients had a three-fragment fracture. Plain radiographs alone did not accurately demonstrate the configuration of the fracture. Twenty patients were asymptomatic when they were evaluated eighteen to thirty-six months after the injury, but only eight of fifteen patients were asymptomatic when they were evaluated thirty-eight months to thirteen years after the fracture. Residual displacement of two millimeters or more after reduction was associated with a less than optimum result unless the epiphyseal fracture was outside the primary weight-bearing area of the ankle.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
C. Shanmugam and N. Maffulli
Sports injuries in children
Br. Med. Bull., June 1, 2008; 86(1): 33 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
K. A. Schnetzler and D. Hoernschemeyer
The Pediatric Triplane Ankle Fracture
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., December 1, 2007; 15(12): 738 - 747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. D. Brown, J. R. Kasser, D. Zurakowski, and D. Jaramillo
Analysis of 51 Tibial Triplane Fractures Using CT with Multiplanar Reconstruction
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2004; 183(5): 1489 - 1495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
TraumaHome page
P Sharma, K. Luscombe, and N Maffulli
Sports injuries in children
Trauma, October 1, 2003; 5(4): 245 - 259.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. M. Flynn, D. Skaggs, P. D. Sponseller, T. J. Ganley, R. M. Kay, and K. K. Leitch
The Operative Management of Pediatric Fractures of the Lower Extremity
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 9, 2002; 84(12): 2288 - 2300.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
R. M. Kay and G. A. Matthys
Pediatric Ankle Fractures: Evaluation and Treatment
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., July 1, 2001; 9(4): 268 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]