This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGraw, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lim, E. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McGraw, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lim, E. V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 70, Issue 6 900-911, Copyright © 1988 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Treatment of open tibial-shaft fractures. External fixation and secondary intramedullary nailing

JM McGraw and EV Lim
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Ohio 45267.

Between 1979 and 1986, sixteen of 369 open fractures of the tibial shaft were treated by external fixation followed by intramedullary nailing. These fractures comprised one Type-I, two Type-II, and thirteen Type-III injuries. This method of treatment was the original treatment plan in nine patients (56 per cent), for delayed union while the external fixator was still in place in four patients (25 per cent), for loss of reduction in a plaster cast in two patients (13 per cent), and for osteomyelitis and a segmental defect in one patient (6 per cent). The average duration of external fixation was 8.5 weeks; the average time between removal of the external fixator and intramedullary nailing, three weeks; and the average time between injury and nailing, twelve weeks. All sixteen patients were followed until either the fracture had united (eleven patients) or there was an established non-union (five patients). At that time, seventeen additional procedures were performed, including bone-grafting, fibulectomy, and re-nailing. Only five of the sixteen fractures healed without additional surgical procedures or major complications. The five fractures that progressed to a non-union were all Type III, and all were complicated by a deep infection. Over-all, the complications included seven deep infections (an intramedullary infection in four patients, osteomyelitis in two, and a chronic draining sinus associated with a ring sequestrum in one); five minor infections during external fixation, which developed into five of the seven deep infections that occurred after the secondary intramedullary nailing; and eight non-unions, three of which progressed to union after multiple procedures. The over-all incidence of non-union was 50 per cent and that of deep infection, 44 per cent. On the basis of the high incidence of complications in both the present series and the few reports in the literature, we concluded that alternative treatment options should be carefully considered before electing this sequential method of fixation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. G. Zalavras, R. E. Marcus, L. S. Levin, and M. J. Patzakis
Management of open fractures and subsequent complications.
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2007; 89(4): 884 - 895.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
G. J. Della Rocca and B. D. Crist
External Fixation Versus Conversion to Intramedullary Nailing for Definitive Management of Closed Fractures of the Femoral and Tibial Shaft
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., September 1, 2006; 14(10): S131 - S135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
P. V. Giannoudis, C. Papakostidis, and C. Roberts
A review of the management of open fractures of the tibia and femur
J Bone Joint Surg Br, March 1, 2006; 88-B(3): 281 - 289.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
S. B. Naique, M. Pearse, and J. Nanchahal
Management of severe open tibial fractures: THE NEED FOR COMBINED ORTHOPAEDIC AND PLASTIC SURGICAL TREATMENT IN SPECIALIST CENTRES
J Bone Joint Surg Br, March 1, 2006; 88-B(3): 351 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
TraumaHome page
S Grannum, A Gardner, and K Porter
Damage control in orthopaedic trauma
Trauma, October 1, 2004; 6(4): 279 - 284.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
C. G. Zalavras and M. J. Patzakis
Open Fractures: Evaluation and Management
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., May 1, 2003; 11(3): 212 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. H Schmidt, C. G. Finkemeier, and P. Tornetta III
Treatment of Closed Tibial Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 29, 2003; 85(2): 352 - 368.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. J. Nowotarski, C. H. Turen, R. J. Brumback, and J. M. Scarboro
Conversion of External Fixation to Intramedullary Nailing for Fractures of the Shaft of the Femur in Multiply Injured Patients
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2000; 82(6): 781 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
W. Zimmerli, A. F. Widmer, M. Blatter, R. Frei, P. E. Ochsner, and for the Foreign-Body Infection Study Group
Role of Rifampin for Treatment of Orthopedic Implant-Related Staphylococcal Infections: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA, May 20, 1998; 279(19): 1537 - 1541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. A. OLSON
Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - Open Fractures of the Tibial Shaft. Current Treatment*{{dagger}}
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 1996; 78(9): 1428 - 37.
[Full Text]