This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zagorski, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Finnieston, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zagorski, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Finnieston, A. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 70, Issue 4 607-610, Copyright © 1988 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. Treatment with prefabricated braces

JB Zagorski, LL Latta, GA Zych and AR Finnieston
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Florida.

Using a prefabricated brace, we treated 233 patients who had a fracture of the humeral shaft. One hundred and seventy patients were available for follow-up, which ranged from five weeks to forty-eight months. In these patients (forty-three open and 127 closed fractures), the average time to union was 10.6 weeks; the average varus-valgus angulation, 5 degrees; the average anterior-posterior angulation, 3 degrees; and the average shortening, as measured radiographically, four millimeters. All but three of the patients had an excellent or a good functional result with a nearly full range of motion of the extremity. There were a minimum of complications, including three non-unions. Because of the low morbidity and high rate of success, we concluded that the treatment of choice for diaphyseal fractures of the humerus is the prefabricated brace.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
A. Dhawan, W. C. Doukas, J. A. Papazis, and C. R. Scoville
Effect of Drain Use in the Early Postoperative Period after Arthroscopically Assisted Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2003; 31(3): 419 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. Sarmiento, J. P. Waddell, and L. L. Latta
Diaphyseal Humeral Fractures: Treatment Options
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2001; 83(10): 1566 - 1579.
[Full Text] [PDF]