This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schajowicz, F.
Right arrow Articles by Gitelis, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schajowicz, F.
Right arrow Articles by Gitelis, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 70, Issue 4 555-564, Copyright © 1988 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Osteosarcomas arising on the surfaces of long bones

F Schajowicz, MH McGuire, E Santini Araujo, DL Muscolo and S Gitelis
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Louis University Medical Center, Missouri 63104.

Malignant bone-forming tumors that arise from the surfaces of long bones are far less common than those that arise from within bone. These surface osteosarcomas are clinically and radiographically similar, yet histologically they are quite distinct. In reviewing the literature, we classified the tumors according to three subgroups: parosteal (juxtacortical) osteosarcoma, periosteal osteosarcoma, and high-grade surface osteosarcoma. We also studied the clinical, radiographic, and histological findings in eighty patients who had been treated for an osteosarcoma over a forty-four-year period. Adequate follow-up data existed for forty-eight of the eighty patients. The duration of follow-up ranged from two to fifteen years after the initial operation (amputation or resection). Patients who had a parosteal osteosarcoma had the best prognosis; those who had a periosteal osteosarcoma, the next best; and those who had a high-grade surface osteosarcoma, the poorest. Because of these widely varying prognoses, the lesions require different treatment.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
M. Hoshi, S. Matsumoto, J. Manabe, T. Tanizawa, T. Shigemitsu, K. Takeuchi, and N. Kawaguchi
Report of Four Cases with High-Grade Surface Osteosarcoma
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2006; 36(3): 180 - 184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. D. Murphey, J. S. Jelinek, H. T. Temple, D. J. Flemming, and F. H. Gannon
Imaging of Periosteal Osteosarcoma: Radiologic-Pathologic Comparison
Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 129 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]