This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Polly, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Savory, C. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Polly, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Savory, C. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 70, Issue 2 192-198, Copyright © 1988 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

The accuracy of selective magnetic resonance imaging compared with the findings of arthroscopy of the knee

DW Polly, JJ Callaghan, RA Sikes, JM McCabe, K McMahon and CG Savory
Orthopaedic Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, D.C. 20307-5001.

The results of selective magnetic resonance imaging of the knee were compared with those of arthroscopy in a prospective series of fifty patients. A specifically designed protocol for imaging, producing T1 sagittal images interleaved at four millimeters while the patient's foot was in 20 degrees of external rotation, was utilized. This technique, called selective magnetic resonance imaging, yielded excellent visualization of the posterior cruciate ligament, medial meniscus, and lateral meniscus in all patients. However, in only 76 per cent of the patients was the anterior cruciate ligament well visualized. Compared with arthroscopy, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of selective magnetic resonance imaging were, respectively, 95.8, 100, and 98 per cent for tears of the medial meniscus; 66.7, 95.1, and 90 per cent for tears of the lateral meniscus; undefined, 100, and 100 per cent for tears of the posterior cruciate ligament; and 100, 96.9, and 97.3 per cent for tears of the anterior cruciate ligament, when that ligament was well visualized. Our selective sequence can be performed in fifteen minutes at a cost that is comparable with that of arthrography. It is totally non-invasive and requires no exposure to ionizing radiation. Selective magnetic resonance imaging can be a safe and valuable adjunct to the clinical evaluation of the knee and an aid to efficient preoperative planning.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. K. Sekiya, D. R. Whiddon, C. T. Zehms, and M. D. Miller
A Clinically Relevant Assessment of Posterior Cruciate Ligament and Posterolateral Corner Injuries. Evaluation of Isolated and Combined Deficiency
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2008; 90(8): 1621 - 1627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
R. Crawford, G. Walley, S. Bridgman, and N. Maffulli
Magnetic resonance imaging versus arthroscopy in the diagnosis of knee pathology, concentrating on meniscal lesions and ACL tears: a systematic review
Br. Med. Bull., December 1, 2007; 84(1): 5 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
A. J. Hart, J. Buscombe, A. Malone, and G. S. E. Dowd
Assessment of osteoarthritis after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: A STUDY USING SINGLE-PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AT TEN YEARS
J Bone Joint Surg Br, November 1, 2005; 87-B(11): 1483 - 1487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. S. Bikkina, C. A. Tujo, A. B. Schraner, and N. M. Major
The "Floating" Meniscus: MRI in Knee Trauma and Implications for Surgery
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 200 - 204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
W. M. Wind Jr, J. A. Bergfeld, and R. D. Parker
Evaluation and Treatment of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: Revisited
Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2004; 32(7): 1765 - 1775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. L. Jackson, P. G. O'Malley, and K. Kroenke
Evaluation of Acute Knee Pain in Primary Care
Ann Intern Med, October 7, 2003; 139(7): 575 - 588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
A. Weiler, G. Peters, J. Maurer, F. N. Unterhauser, and N. P. Sudkamp
Biomechanical Properties and Vascularity of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Can Be Predicted by Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Two-Year Study in Sheep
Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2001; 29(6): 751 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. S. Kocher, J. DiCanzio, D. Zurakowski, and L. J. Micheli
Dignostic Performance of Clinical Examination and Selective Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Intraarticular Knee Disorders in Children and Adolescents
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2001; 29(3): 292 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
B. Mjöberg and S. J. McCabe
Correspondence
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2000; 82(1): 144 - 144.
[Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Lee, M. J. Siegel, D. M. Lau, C. F. Hildebolt, and M. J. Matava
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears: MR Imaging-based Diagnosis in a Pediatric Population
Radiology, December 1, 1999; 213(3): 697 - 704.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. J. Matava, K. Eck, W. Totty, R. W. Wright, and R. A. Shively
Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Tool to Predict Meniscal Reparability
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1999; 27(4): 436 - 443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
C. D. Harner and J. Hoher
Evaluation and Treatment of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 1998; 26(3): 471 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
C. L. Stanitski
Correlation of Arthroscopic and Clinical Examinations With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings of Injured Knees in Children and Adolescents
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1998; 26(1): 2 - 6.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
Accuracy of Imaging the Menisci on an In-Office, Dedicated, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Extremity System*: Peter D. Franklin,{dagger} MD, Richard A. Lemon,{ddagger}{section} MD, and Howard S. Barden,||a PhD
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 1997; 25(3): 382 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
T. Adalberth, H. Roos, M. Lauren, P. Akeson, M. Sloth, K. Jonsson, A. Lindstrand, and L. S. Lohmander
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Scintigraphy, and Arthroscopic Evaluation of Traumatic Hemarthrosis of the Knee
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1997; 25(2): 231 - 237.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. Meister, N. L. Harris, P. A. Indelicato, and G. Miller
Comparison of an Optical Catheter Office Arthroscope with a Standard Rigid Rod-Lens Arthroscope in the Evaluation of the Knee
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1996; 24(6): 819 - 823.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. J. O'Shea, K. P. Murphy, R. D. Heekin, and P. J. Herzwurm
The Diagnostic Accuracy of History, Physical Examination, and Radiographs in the Evaluation of Traumatic Knee Disorders
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1996; 24(2): 164 - 167.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
H. J. Gelb, S. G. Glasgow, A. A. Sapega, and J. S. Torg
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Knee Disorders: Clinical Value and Cost-Effectiveness in a Sports Medicine Practice
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1996; 24(1): 99 - 103.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
R. F. LaPrade, Q. M. Burnett II, M. A. Veenstra, and C. G. Hodgman
The Prevalence of Abnormal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Asymptomatic Knees: With Correlation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Arthroscopic Findings in Symptomatic Knees
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1994; 22(6): 739 - 745.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. P. Spindler, J. P. Schils, J. A. Bergfeld, J. T. Andrish, G. G. Weiker, T. E. Anderson, D. W. Piraino, B. J. Richmond, and S. V. Medendorp
Prospective study of osseous, articular, and meniscal lesions in recent anterior cruciate ligament tears by magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1993; 21(4): 551 - 557.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. K. Graf, D. A. Cook, A. A. De Smet, and J. S. Keene
"Bone bruises" on magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament injuries
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1993; 21(2): 220 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. L. Gross, J. S. Grover, L. W. Bassett, L. L. Seeger, and G. A.M. Finerman
Magnetic resonance imaging of the posterior cruciate ligament: Clinical use to improve diagnostic accuracy
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1992; 20(6): 732 - 737.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
J. J. Bonamo, K. J. Kessler, and J. Noah
Arthroscopic meniscectomy in patients over the age of 40
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1992; 20(4): 422 - 429.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. B. Krinsky, T. E. Abdenour, C. Starkey, R. A. Albo, and D. A. Chu
Incidence of lateral meniscus injury in professional basketball players
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1992; 20(1): 17 - 19.
[Abstract] [PDF]