This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brumback, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Burgess, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brumback, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Burgess, A. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 70, Issue 10 1453-1462, Copyright © 1988 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Part II: Fracture-healing with static interlocking fixation

RJ Brumback, S Uwagie-Ero, RP Lakatos, A Poka, GH Bathon and AR Burgess
Shock Trauma Center, Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems, Baltimore 21201.

A consecutive, prospective series of ninety-seven patients who had 100 fractures of the femoral shaft that were treated with static interlocking nailing was analyzed to determine the incidence of union of the fracture without planned conversion from static to dynamic intramedullary fixation as a technique to stimulate healing of the fracture. Eighty-four patients (eighty-seven fractures) were studied through union of the fracture (average follow-up, fourteen months). Eighty-five (98 per cent) of the eighty-seven fractures healed with static interlocking fixation. Two patients needed conversion from static to dynamic interlocking fixation because of inadequate fracture-healing; both progressed to uneventful union. The time to full weight-bearing (average, eleven weeks) was individualized for each patient and depended on the cortical contact of the major fragments, the presence of bridging callus as seen on radiographs, and the extent of other injuries of the ipsilateral lower extremity. No deformation or failure of the static interlocking device developed after early walking with weight-bearing, but fatigue failure of one nail occurred in a non-ambulatory patient who had an intracranial injury. Pain related to soft-tissue irritation by the prominent heads of the interlocking screws, clinically presenting as bursitis or snapping of the iliotibial band, was severe enough in six patients to necessitate removal of either the proximal or the distal screw after union of the fracture. We concluded that static interlocking of intramedullary nails in femoral shaft fractures does not appreciably inhibit the process of healing of the fracture, and that routine conversion to dynamic intramedullary fixation, although occasionally necessary, need not be performed.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
E. Katsoulis, C. Court-Brown, and P. V. Giannoudis
Incidence and aetiology of anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of the femur and tibia
J Bone Joint Surg Br, May 1, 2006; 88-B(5): 576 - 580.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. Bargiotas, D. Wohlrab, J. J. Sewecke, G. Lavinge, P. J. DeMeo, and N. G. Sotereanos
Arthrodesis of the Knee with a Long Intramedullary Nail Following the Failure of a Total Knee Arthroplasty as the Result of Infection
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2006; 88(3): 553 - 558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
TraumaHome page
A Gaffey and M. Blakemore
Femoral shaft fractures
Trauma, April 1, 2003; 5(2): 103 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. Wolinsky, N. Tejwani, J. H. Richmond, K. J. Koval, K. Egol, and D. J.G. Stephen
Controversies in Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2001; 83(9): 1404 - 1415.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. J. Nowotarski, C. H. Turen, R. J. Brumback, and J. M. Scarboro
Conversion of External Fixation to Intramedullary Nailing for Fractures of the Shaft of the Femur in Multiply Injured Patients
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2000; 82(6): 781 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
R. J. Brumback and W. W. Virkus
Intramedullary Nailing of the Femur: Reamed Versus Nonreamed
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., March 1, 2000; 8(2): 83 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. J. BRUMBACK, T. R. TOAL, M. S. MURPHY-ZANE, V. P. NOVAK, and S. M. BELKOFF
Immediate Weight-Bearing After Treatment of a Comminuted Fracture of the Femoral Shaft with a Statically Locked Intramedullary Nail
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 1999; 81(11): 1538 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. J. DUWELIUS, R. HUCKFELDT, R. J. MULLINS, T. SHIOTA, T. S. WOLL, K. H. LINDSEY, and D. WHEELER
The Effects of Femoral Intramedullary Reaming on Pulmonary Function in a Sheep Lung Model
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 1997; 79(2): 194 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text]