This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davy, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Burstein, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davy, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Burstein, A. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 70, Issue 1 45-50, Copyright © 1988 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Telemetric force measurements across the hip after total arthroplasty

DT Davy, GM Kotzar, RH Brown, KG Heiple, VM Goldberg, KG Heiple, J Berilla and AH Burstein
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44104.

A telemeterized total hip prosthesis was implanted in one patient and force-data were obtained. Thirty-one days postoperatively, the magnitude of the joint-contact force during double-limb stance was 1.0 times body weight. During ipsilateral single-limb stance the joint-contact force was 2.1 times body weight, and during the stance phase of gait the peak force typically was 2.6 to 2.8 times body weight, with the resultant force located on the anterosuperior portion of the ball. During stair-climbing, the force was 2.6 times body weight. At peak loads, the angle between the resultant force and the axis of the neck was 30 to 35 degrees and that between the resultant force and the plane of the prosthesis was 20 degrees. During stair-climbing or straight-leg raising, the out-of-plane orientation of the resultant force increased substantially. These data provide information concerning the forces that must be sustained by prosthetic hip joints during a number of common activities of daily living within the first month after implantation. The results also provide insight into the progression of early recovery and demonstrate the variety of forces that are generated during this period.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
C. P. Skurla, G. E. Pluhar, D. J. Frankel, E. L. Egger, and S. P. James
Assessing the dog as a model for human total hip replacement: ANALYSIS OF 38 CANINE CEMENTED FEMORAL COMPONENTS RETRIEVED AT POST-MORTEM
J Bone Joint Surg Br, January 1, 2005; 87-B(1): 120 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. N. Sangiorgio, E. Ebramzadeh, D. B. Longjohn, and L. D. Dorr
Effects of Dorsal Flanges on Fixation of a Cemented Total Hip Replacement Femoral Stem
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2004; 86(4): 813 - 820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
B. Unver, V. Karatosun, I. Gunal, and S. Angin
Comparison of two different rehabilitation programmes for thrust plate prosthesis: a randomized controlled study
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2004; 18(1): 84 - 91.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
E. Ebramzadeh, S. N. Sangiorgio, D. B. Longjohn, C. F. Buhari, and L. D. Dorr
Initial Stability of Cemented Femoral Stems as a Function of Surface Finish, Collar, and Stem Size
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2004; 86(1): 106 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. D. Komistek, D. A. Dennis, J. A. Ochoa, B. D. Haas, and C. Hammill
In Vivo Comparison of Hip Separation After Metal-on-Metal or Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 10, 2002; 84(10): 1836 - 1841.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
B. A. Morris, D. D. D'Lima, J. Slamin, N. Kovacevic, S. W. Arms, C. P. Townsend, and C. W. Colwell Jr.
e-Knee: Evolution of the Electronic Knee Prosthesis : Telemetry Technology Development
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2001; 83(90021): S62 - 66.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. J. BRUMBACK, T. R. TOAL, M. S. MURPHY-ZANE, V. P. NOVAK, and S. M. BELKOFF
Immediate Weight-Bearing After Treatment of a Comminuted Fracture of the Femoral Shaft with a Statically Locked Intramedullary Nail
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 1999; 81(11): 1538 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. A. LOCH, R. F. KYLE, J. E. BECHTOLD, M. KANE, K. ANDERSON, and R. E. SHERMAN
Forces Required to Initiate Sliding in Second-Generation Intramedullary Nails
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 1998; 80(11): 1626 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text]