This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Griscom, N. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Griscom, N. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 69, Issue 8 1169-1176, Copyright © 1987 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Femoral anteversion

SB Murphy, SR Simon, PK Kijewski, RH Wilkinson and NT Griscom
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.

Biplane roentgenography, axial roentgenography, and fluoroscopy are the usual roentgenographic methods of measuring femoral anteversion. These methods use a strict geometrical definition of anteversion. The computerized tomography method of measuring anteversion that was developed recently, and is now widely used, does not adhere to the accepted definition of anteversion and has not been tested for accuracy in a large series. In the present study, the widely used computerized-tomography method of measuring anteversion was tested on thirty-two femoral specimens. With that method, anteversion was consistently underestimated by an average of 10 degrees compared with direct measurements and was reproducible only to within +/- 3.6 degrees. Therefore, a new method of measuring anteversion using computerized tomography was developed. It was shown to be accurate to +/- 1 degree, as tested on the same specimens. This study demonstrated geometrically why the currently practiced computerized-tomography method of selecting the points that are used to define the axis of the femoral neck is not consistent with geometrical definitions of anteversion. A more accurate method for both defining the axis of the femoral neck and measuring femoral anteversion is described and recommended for clinical use.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Tannast, K. A. Siebenrock, and S. E. Anderson
Femoroacetabular Impingement: Radiographic Diagnosis--What the Radiologist Should Know
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): 1540 - 1552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
M. T Cibulka
Determination and Significance of Femoral Neck Anteversion
Physical Therapy, June 1, 2004; 84(6): 550 - 558.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. R. Davids, A. D. Marshall, E. R. Blocker, S. L. Frick, D. W. Blackhurst, and E. Skewes
Femoral Anteversion in Children with Cerebral Palsy: Assessment with Two and Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Scans
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 11, 2003; 85(3): 481 - 488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. Hernigou, F. Duparc, and A. Hernigou
Determining Humeral Retroversion with Computed Tomography
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 10, 2002; 84(10): 1753 - 1762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. TÖNNIS and A. HEINECKE
Current Concepts Review - Acetabular and Femoral Anteversion: Relationship with Osteoarthritis of the Hip
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 1999; 81(12): 1747 - 70.
[Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. R. BINDRA, R. J. COLE, K. YAMAGUCHI, B. A. EVANOFF, T. K. PILGRAM, L. A. GILULA, and R. H. GELBERMAN
Quantification of the Radial Torsion Angle with Computerized Tomography in Cadaver Specimens
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 1997; 79(6): 833 - 7.
[Abstract] [Full Text]