This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yoshioka, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Cooke, T. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yoshioka, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Cooke, T. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 69, Issue 6 873-880, Copyright © 1987 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

The anatomy and functional axes of the femur

Y Yoshioka, D Siu and TD Cooke

Linear and angular measurements were made on thirty-two cadaveric femora with respect to the mechanical (functional) axes of the bone. The long axis was defined as a line from the center of the femoral head to the anterolateral attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament. The transverse axis was defined as a line through the posterior cruciate ligament parallel to the line connecting each epicondyle. The condylar width, the length of each interepicondylar line, correlated well with depth, but the projections of the condyles from the transverse plane revealed significant variations from specimen to specimen. Considerable variation also was found between femora in terms of angular dimensions (that is, the angle of anteversion and the neck-shaft angle proximally, and the valgus angle of the femoral shaft distally). Considerable interspecimen variation in the angles between the transcondylar plane and the femoral center, in accord with the valgus angle of the femoral shaft distally, was also noted. The mean transcondylar valgus angle (described as the tangent of the condyles to the perpendicular of the long axis) was 3.8 degrees. In contrast, little variation among specimens was noted for the angle made by the shaft and the long axis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. G. Eckhoff, J. M. Bach, V. M. Spitzer, K. D. Reinig, M. M. Bagur, T. H. Baldini, and N. M.P. Flannery
Three-Dimensional Mechanics, Kinematics, and Morphology of the Knee Viewed in Virtual Reality
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2005; 87(suppl_2): 71 - 80.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. A. Siston, J. J. Patel, S. B. Goodman, S. L. Delp, and N. J. Giori
The Variability of Femoral Rotational Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2005; 87(10): 2276 - 2280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. Hitt, J. R. Shurman II, K. Greene, J. McCarthy, J. Moskal, T. Hoeman, and M. A. Mont
Anthropometric Measurements of the Human Knee: Correlation to the Sizing of Current Knee Arthroplasty Systems
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2003; 85(90004): 115 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. S. Leopold, C. D. Silverton, R. M. Barden, and A. G. Rosenberg
Isolated Revision of the Patellar Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 17, 2003; 85(1): 41 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
L. Shepstone, J. Rogers, J. Kirwan, and B. Silverman
The shape of the distal femur: a palaeopathological comparison of eburnated and non-eburnated femora
Ann Rheum Dis, February 1, 1999; 58(2): 72 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text]