This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levin, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Browner, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levin, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Browner, B. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 69, Issue 5 761-766, Copyright © 1987 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Radiation exposure to the surgeon during closed interlocking intramedullary nailing

PE Levin, RW Schoen and BD Browner

During interlocking intramedullary nailing of twenty-five femoral and five tibial fractures, the primary surgeon wore both a universal film badge on the collar of the lead apron and a thermoluminescent dosimeter ring on the dominant hand to quantify the radiation that he or she received. When distal interlocking was performed, the first ring was removed and a second ring was used so that a separate recording could be made for this portion of the procedure. At the conclusion of the study, all of the recorded doses of radiation were averaged. The average amount of radiation to the head and neck during the entire procedure was 7.0 millirems of deep exposure and 8.0 millirems of shallow exposure. The average dose of radiation to the dominant hand during insertion of the intramedullary nail and the proximal interlocking screw was 13.0 millirems, while the average amount during insertion of the distal interlocking nail was 12.0 millirems. Both of these averages are well within the government guidelines for allowable exposure to radiation during one-quarter (three months) of a year. Precautions that are to be observed during this procedure are recommended.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
I. A. Tsalafoutas, V. Tsapaki, A. Kaliakmanis, S. Pneumaticos, F. Tsoronis, E. D. Koulentianos, and G. Papachristou
Estimation of radiation doses to patients and surgeons from various fluoroscopically guided orthopaedic surgeries
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, January 1, 2008; 128(1): 112 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
B. L. Badman, L. Rill, B. Butkovich, M. Arreola, and R. A. V. Griend
Radiation Exposure with Use of the Mini-C-Arm for Routine Orthopaedic Imaging Procedures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2005; 87(1): 13 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. R. Tremains, G. M. Georgiadis, and M. J. Dennis
Radiation Exposure With Use Of the Inverted-C-Arm Technique in Upper-Extremity Surgery
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2001; 83(5): 674 - 678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. J. Larson, J. Egbert, and E. M. Goble
Radiation Exposure During Fluoroarthroscopically Assisted Anterior Cruciate Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1995; 23(4): 462 - 464.
[Abstract] [PDF]