This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vince, K. G.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vince, K. G.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 69, Issue 5 654-661, Copyright © 1987 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Cross-union complicating fracture of the forearm. Part II: Children

KG Vince and JE Miller

Cross-union is a rare complication of fractures of the forearm in children. Of the ten cross-unions reported in this series, four were Type 2 (middle third or non-articular part of the distal third of the radius and ulna) and six were Type 3 (proximal third of the forearm). There were no Type-1 (intra-articular part of the distal third of the radius and ulna) cross-unions. As in adults, the Type-2 cross-unions followed a high-energy injury. Three of the four Type-2 cross-unions were excised; one of them recurred. Type-3 cross-unions occurred equally after closed or open reduction of a fracture. Three patients with a Type-3 cross-union had excision of the radial head. The only patient who did not have a recurrence of the cross-union also underwent insertion of a prosthesis for the radial head. The results after resection of a cross-union appear to be better in the adult than in the child, although the number of patients in this and other studies is too small to allow firm conclusions.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?