This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by West, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Collier, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by West, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Collier, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 69, Issue 1 58-64, Copyright © 1987 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc

JOURNAL CONTENTS

Potential errors inherent in quantitative densitometric analysis of orthopaedic radiographs. A study after total hip arthroplasty

JD West, MB Mayor and JP Collier

We sought to determine whether x-ray densitometry could be used to provide quantitative information about the growth and resorption of bone in a retrospective analysis of the radiographs of patients who had a non-cemented hip prosthesis. We examined variables that were likely to be uncontrolled in routine orthopaedic radiographs for their effect on radiographic (film) density. Changes in film lots, exposure, target distance, field variability (heel effect), and femoral orientation were independently analyzed for radiographs of precisely oriented femora of cadavera and a radiology step-wedge. Despite attempts to normalize these variables, we found that retrospective comparison of serial radiographs of patients for densitometric analysis of change in the bone was prone to significant error. In uncontrolled radiographs, non-uniformity of exposure, intensity of the radiation field, target distance, and deviation in femoral rotation will be likely to result in substantial variations in the apparent thickness or density of the femoral cortex and make quantitative comparisons of serial radiographs unreliable.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?