This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lange, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Yandow, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lange, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Yandow, D. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 69, Issue 1 100-105, Copyright © 1987 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Ultrasound imaging as a screening study for malignant soft-tissue tumors

TA Lange, CW Austin, JJ Seibert, TL Angtuaco and DR Yandow

Fifty patients who had a palpable soft-tissue mass and an apparently normal radiograph were studied with ultrasound imaging before excision or biopsy of the lesion was done. As shown by the sonograms, thirty-five lesions had a discrete echo pattern (usually reduced echoes and a clearly defined lesional margin) and fifteen had an ill defined pattern (similar to the pattern of the surrounding normal tissues with no definable lesional margin). Fourteen lesions were malignant and thirty-six, benign. The sonograms of all fourteen malignant lesions showed a discrete pattern, while the sonograms of the benign ones showed twenty-one discrete and fifteen ill defined patterns. Therefore, the malignant lesions produced a discrete pattern in every instance, and every lesion that produced an ill defined pattern was benign. Fourteen of the fifty lesions were cystic; of these, thirteen were benign and one was malignant. The sonograms correctly identified the cyst in seven of the thirteen benign lesions and in the one malignant cystic lesion. Based on these findings, we concluded that all palpable soft-tissue masses that appear to be discrete on a sonogram should be diagnosed without delay by examination of a specimen taken at biopsy, whereas lesions that have an ill defined appearance on a sonogram may be assumed to be benign and may safely be observed in selected patients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?