This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rock, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Dahlin, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rock, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Dahlin, D. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 68, Issue 7 1073-1079, Copyright © 1986 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Secondary malignant giant-cell tumor of bone. Clinicopathological assessment of nineteen patients

MG Rock, FH Sim, KK Unni, GA Witrak, FJ Frassica, MF Schray, JW Beabout and DC Dahlin

Twenty-six patients who had a malignant giant-cell tumor of bone--a sarcoma either juxtaposed to a zone of typical benign giant-cell tumor or occurring at the site of a previously documented benign giant-cell tumor--have been seen at the Mayo Clinic. Of the twenty-six tumors, nineteen were secondary to a previous attempt at local control of a benign giant-cell tumor. All but one of these nineteen patients with a secondary tumor had received therapeutic irradiation four to thirty-nine years earlier. The nature and duration of the symptoms and the sites of predilection of the malignant giant-cell tumors were the same as for benign giant-cell tumor. Fibrosarcoma occurred three times as frequently as osteosarcoma. The best results of treatment of the secondary sarcoma were obtained with early ablation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
B. Hoch, C. Inwards, M. Sundaram, and A. E. Rosenberg
Multicentric Giant Cell Tumor of Bone. Clinicopathologic Analysis of Thirty Cases
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2006; 88(9): 1998 - 2008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. D. Murphey, G. C. Nomikos, D. J. Flemming, F. H. Gannon, H. T. Temple, and M. J. Kransdorf
Imaging of Giant Cell Tumor and Giant Cell Reparative Granuloma of Bone: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2001; 21(5): 1283 - 1309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. J. B. SAKKERS, R. O. VAN DER HEUL, H. M. KROON, A. H. M. TAMINIAU, and P. C. W. HOGENDOORN
Late Malignant Transformation of a Benign Giant-Cell Tumor of Bone. A Case Report
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 1997; 79(2): 259 - 62.
[Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. J. LEWIS, J. H. HEALEY, A. G. HUVOS, and M. BURT
Benign Giant-Cell Tumor of Bone with Metastasis to Mediastinal Lymph Nodes. A Case Report of Resection Facilitated with Use of steroids
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 1996; 78(1): 106 - 10.
[Full Text]