This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gelberman, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gelberman, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, R. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 68, Issue 7 1000-1007, Copyright © 1986 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

The association of femoral retroversion with slipped capital femoral epiphysis

RH Gelberman, MS Cohen, BA Shaw, JR Kasser, PP Griffin and RH Wilkinson

We examined twenty-five patients who had a unilateral or bilateral slip of the capital femoral epiphysis and determined the degree of anteversion of the thirty-nine involved hips with computerized axial tomography. Thirteen patients (eighteen hips) were seen at the time of the original diagnosis (Group I), and twelve patients (twenty-one hips) were seen one to seven years after operative treatment (Group II). The mean amount of anteversion for all of the involved hips was +1.0 +/- 8.2 degrees. The mean amount of anteversion for the Group-I hips was -0.7 +/- 7.4 degrees and the mean amount for the Group-II hips was 2.5 +/- 8.7 degrees. The mean amount of anteversion for the hips in both Groups I and II was less than the predicted mean amount for individuals of the same age. The mean amount of anteversion of the unaffected hips of our patients who had a unilateral slip was +6.3 +/- 8.2 degrees. The amount of internal rotation of the hip in extension exceeded the amount when it was in flexion in all of the patients. A decreased angle of femoral anteversion appears to be specifically associated with the development of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. The mechanical forces that act across the proximal femoral physis may be altered by this rotational abnormality, and this may lead to an increased shear stress that ultimately causes failure of the growth plate.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. T. Loder, J. Nechleba, J. O. Sanders, and P. Doyle
Idiopathic Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis in Amish Children
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2005; 87(3): 543 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
M. T Cibulka
Determination and Significance of Femoral Neck Anteversion
Physical Therapy, June 1, 2004; 84(6): 550 - 558.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. T. Loder, D. D. Aronsson, M. B. Dobbs, and S. L. Weinstein
Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis*{{dagger}}
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2000; 82(8): 1170 - 1170.
[Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
F. T. Hoaglund, L. S. Steinbach, D. A. Goodman, J. E. Feighan, A. D. Smith, B. Latimer, R. L. Buly, and D. R. Cooperman
Correspondence
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2000; 82(1): 142 - 3.
[Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. TÖNNIS and A. HEINECKE
Current Concepts Review - Acetabular and Femoral Anteversion: Relationship with Osteoarthritis of the Hip
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 1999; 81(12): 1747 - 70.
[Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. W. Pritchett, J. M. Hurley, R. R. Betz, R. S. Davidson, H. H. Steel, R. T. Loder, and P. D. Alburger
Correspondence
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 1997; 79(3): 470-b - 1.
[Full Text]