This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ippolito, E.
Right arrow Articles by Scola, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ippolito, E.
Right arrow Articles by Scola, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 68, Issue 3 333-344, Copyright © 1986 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Analysis at maturity of fifty-three patients treated conservatively

E Ippolito, R Caterini and E Scola

From a pool of 131 supracondylar fractures of the humerus in 131 patients who were treated conservatively, all of which healed in an average time of 4.5 weeks without complications related to the treatment itself, the cases of fifty-three patients were reviewed at maturity. The average age at follow-up was twenty-six years. Nine patients had unimportant limitation of elbow motion, and slight atrophy of the musculature of the arm or forearm, or of both, was present in six patients. Arm-length discrepancy was never observed. The carrying angle remained at about the same value that had been present at the time of fracture-healing in eighteen patients, decreased in twenty-two patients, and increased in thirteen. Malrotation of the distal fragment of the fracture only rarely caused medial tilting of the fragment with consequent cubitus varus. Varus deformity was present in four patients and valgus deformity, in three. None of the patients with valgus deformity had ulnar-nerve palsy. According to our results, varus and valgus deformities of the elbow after supracondylar fractures of the humerus seem to be caused either by growth imbalance of the growth plate of the distal end of the humerus (four patients) or by malreduction of the fracture (three patients). Twelve patients in the entire pool had neurological complications at the time of the fracture. Ten of those patients fully recovered from the deficit, whereas two--one with a radial-nerve deficit and the other with ulnar-nerve involvement--still had neurological impairment at follow-up.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?