This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garfin, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Nickel, V. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garfin, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Nickel, V. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 68, Issue 3 320-325, Copyright © 1986 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc

JOURNAL CONTENTS

Complications in the use of the halo fixation device

SR Garfin, MJ Botte, RL Waters and VL Nickel

The medical records of 179 patients were reviewed to identify complications related to the use of the halo external skeletal-fixation device. The complications that were identified included pin-loosening in 36 per cent of the patients, pin-site infection in 20 per cent, pressure sores under either a plastic vest or a plaster cast in 11 per cent, nerve injury in 2 per cent, dural penetration in 1 per cent, dysphagia in 2 per cent, cosmetically disfiguring scars in 9 per cent, and severe pin discomfort in 18 per cent. One hundred and eighty (25 per cent) of the 716 pins used had become loose at least once, and an infection had developed at sixty-seven pin sites (9 per cent). Two-thirds of the pins that were loose or associated with infection required change or removal. These complication rates, particularly of pin-loosening and infection, are exceedingly high. Attention to details in pin application, pin maintenance, and proper pin-site care may minimize the number of complications.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
C. M. Bono
The Halo Fixator
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., December 1, 2007; 15(12): 728 - 737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
P. Platzer, G. Thalhammer, G. Oberleitner, R. Schuster, V. Vecsei, and C. Gaebler
Surgical Treatment of Dens Fractures in Elderly Patients
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2007; 89(8): 1716 - 1722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
L. A.B. Copley, J. P. Dormans, M. D. Pepe, V. Tan, and R. H. Browne
Accuracy and Reliability of Torque Wrenches Used for Halo Application in Children
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2003; 85(11): 2199 - 2204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
J. A. Nemeth and L. G. Mattingly
Six-Pin Halo Fixation and the Resulting Prevalence of Pin-Site Complications
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2001; 83(3): 377 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
M. D. SMITH, L. J. JOHNSON, J. H. PERRA, and B. A. RAWLINS
A Biomechanical Study of Torque and Accuracy of Halo Pin Insertional Devices
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 1996; 78(2): 231 - 8.
[Abstract] [Full Text]