This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by White, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clark, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by White, A. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 67, Issue 9 1340-1348, Copyright © 1985 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Fractures of the dens. A multicenter study

CR Clark and AA White

The treatment of fractures of the dens is often inadequate, and surgeons are divided in their opinions regarding the best surgical management of these potentially serious injuries. Because of these concerns, the Cervical Spine Research Society conducted a multicenter survey of its membership regarding the management of these fractures. Fractures of the dens can be effectively classified according to the anatomical level of the fracture, as described by Anderson and d'Alonzo. We have found that the degree of angulation and amount of displacement are also important factors. Fractures occurring at the junction of the dens with the vertebral body (Type-II fractures) were found to be the most troublesome. The initial management of these fractures with a halo device was successful in only 68 per cent; however, posterior cervical fusion was successful in 96 per cent, and that appears to be the treatment of choice. Fractures extending into the vertebral body (Type-III injuries) were found not to be as benign as has been reported. Malunion and non-union occurred in patients with this injury who were treated with an orthosis alone, and a halo device or surgery may be indicated for unstable lesions.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. Platzer, G. Thalhammer, G. Oberleitner, R. Schuster, V. Vecsei, and C. Gaebler
Surgical Treatment of Dens Fractures in Elderly Patients
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2007; 89(8): 1716 - 1722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
L. Barker, J. Anderson, R. Chesnut, G. Nesbit, T. Tjauw, and R. Hart
Reliability and Reproducibility of Dens Fracture Classification with Use of Plain Radiography and Reformatted Computer-Aided Tomography
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2006; 88(1): 106 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
TraumaHome page
A Gardner, S Grannum, and K. Porter
Cervical spine trauma
Trauma, July 1, 2005; 7(3): 109 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. R. Rudzki, L. G. Lenke, K. Blanke, and K. D. Riew
Pseudarthrosis of a Thirty-nine-Year-Old Dens Fracture Causing Myelopathy. A Case Report
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2004; 86(11): 2509 - 2513.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
L. D. Anderson and R. T. D'Alonzo
Fractures of the Odontoid Process of the Axis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2004; 86(9): 2081 - 2081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
R. S. Jackson, D. M. Banit, A. L. Rhyne III, and B. V. Darden II
Upper Cervical Spine Injuries
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., July 1, 2002; 10(4): 271 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]