This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Callaghan, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pedersen, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Callaghan, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pedersen, D. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 67, Issue 9 1328-1335, Copyright © 1985 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Hip arthrodesis. A long-term follow-up

JJ Callaghan, RA Brand and DR Pedersen

In a retrospective study, we examined twenty-eight patients who had had an arthrodesis seventeen to fifty years previously (average, thirty-five years). Hip and knee ratings were obtained, as well as anteroposterior and flexion-extension radiographs of the lumbar spine and standing anteroposterior radiographs of the knees and hips. About 60 per cent of the patients had pain in the ipsilateral knee (average time to onset, twenty-three years after arthrodesis), and a similar percentage had back pain (average time to onset, twenty-five years after the operation). Pain in the contralateral hip occurred in approximately 25 per cent of the patients (average time to onset, twenty years after arthrodesis). Only one patient was unemployed due to disabling pain in the back or knee. Seventy per cent of the patients could walk more than one mile (1.6 kilometers), and a similar percentage could sit comfortably for at least two hours. Seventy-five per cent of the patients had anteroposterior laxity of the ipsilateral knee, and 80 per cent had mediolateral laxity. The patients whose hip was fused in some abduction more frequently had pain in the ipsilateral knee and the back, and they had greater degenerative changes in the ipsilateral knee than the patients whose hip was fused in adduction or in the neutral position. Six patients had undergone total hip arthroplasty for pain in the back or the ipsilateral knee, or both, and all had marked relief of back pain, while two of four had relief of pain in the knee. Two patients had a total knee arthroplasty for relief of pain in the ipsilateral knee.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. R. Rozbruch, D. Paley, A. Bhave, and J. E. Herzenberg
Ilizarov Hip Reconstruction for the Late Sequelae of Infantile Hip Infection
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2005; 87(5): 1007 - 1018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
J. Sanchez-Sotelo, R. T. Trousdale, D. J. Berry, and M. E. Cabanela
Surgical Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Adults: I. Nonarthroplasty Options
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., September 1, 2002; 10(5): 321 - 333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. B. Joshi, L. Markovic, K. Hardinge, and J. C.M. Murphy
Conversion of a Fused Hipto Total Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 12, 2002; 84(8): 1335 - 1341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
P. E. Beaule, J. M. Matta, and J. W. Mast
Hip Arthrodesis: Current Indications and Techniques
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., July 1, 2002; 10(4): 249 - 258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
Y. Hasegawa, T. Iwase, S. Kitamura, K.-i. Yamauchi, S. Sakano, and H. Iwata
Eccentric Rotational Acetabular Osteotomy for Acetabular Dysplasia : Follow-up of One Hundred and Thirty-two Hips for Five to Ten Years
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2002; 84(3): 404 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. Hamadouche, L. Kerboull, A. Meunier, J. P. Courpied, and M. Kerboull
Total Hip Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Ankylosed Hips : A Five to Twenty-one-Year Follow-up Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2001; 83(7): 992 - 998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
G. M. Robbins, B. A. Masri, D. S. Garbuz, and C. P. Duncan
Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty After Infection
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2001; 83(4): 601 - 601.
[Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
L. M. Coester, C. L. Saltzman, J. Leupold, and W. Pontarelli
Long-Term Results Following Ankle Arthrodesis for Post-Traumatic Arthritis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2001; 83(2): 219 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
R W CRAWFORD and D W MURRAY
Total hip replacement: indications for surgery and risk factors for failure
Ann Rheum Dis, August 1, 1997; 56(8): 455 - 457.
[Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. E. TORCHIA, R. A. KLASSEN, and A. J. BIANCO
Total Hip Arthroplasty with Cement in Patients Less Than Twenty Years Old. Long-Term Results
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 1996; 78(7): 995 - 1003.
[Abstract] [Full Text]