This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ippolito, E.
Right arrow Articles by Massobrio, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ippolito, E.
Right arrow Articles by Massobrio, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 67, Issue 1 30-38, Copyright © 1985 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Long-term results of open sternocleidomastoid tenotomy for idiopathic muscular torticollis

E Ippolito, C Tudisco and M Massobrio

At the end of their skeletal growth, we evaluated the cases of sixty-seven patients who had had an open tenotomy of the sternal and clavicular origins of the sternocleidomastoid muscle for idiopathic muscular torticollis. The average length of follow-up was 15.4 years, and the average age at the last follow-up was 23.9 years. The patients were divided into three groups according to their age at the time of operation. Group I consisted of patients who were operated on between the ages of five months and six years; Group II, of patients who were operated on between the ages of seven and eleven years; and Group III, of patients who were operated on when they were twelve years old or older. According to our method of evaluation, 37 per cent of the patients had a good, 45 per cent had a fair, and 18 per cent had a poor result. The patients in Group I had the best results and those in Group III, the worst. In general, the patient's age at operation, the duration of the disease, and the severity of the deformity before the operation had the major effects on both cosmetic and functional results.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?