This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nettelblad, H.
Right arrow Articles by Weiland, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nettelblad, H.
Right arrow Articles by Weiland, A. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 66, Issue 9 1421-1430, Copyright © 1984 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Free microvascular epiphyseal-plate transplantation. An experimental study in dogs

H Nettelblad, MA Randolph and AJ Weiland

To evaluate the feasibility of transplanting vascularized epiphyseal plates while maintaining normal growth in the recipient site, twenty-two puppies from known, large breeds were divided into one control and three experimental groups of four animals each and one long-term group of six animals. The control group underwent insertion of a radiopaque marker in the fibular metaphysis bilaterally, and, in addition, a fibular osteotomy was performed on one side. In the experimental groups, a fibular switch was carried out, selecting one fibula as a vascularized graft and the other as a non-vascularized graft. Both the controls and the experimental groups were evaluated using serial roentgenograms, histological examination, fluorescent bone-labeling, and microangiography. One week, six weeks, three months, and seven months postoperatively, animals from each group were killed. Continuous growth was observed in the vascularized epiphyseal transplants and in the controls, with no statistical difference noted, whereas the non-vascularized transplants exhibited considerably less or no growth. Vascularized transplants demonstrated an average 21.2-millimeter increase in length while non-vascularized transplants showed a 6.6-millimeter increase. Histological examination, fluorochrome bone-labeling, and microangiography confirmed the continued viability of the vascularized epiphyseal transplants in contrast to the non-vascularized transplants.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
M. Ghert, N. Colterjohn, and M. Manfrini
The Use of Free Vascularized Fibular Grafts in Skeletal Reconstruction for Bone Tumors in Children
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., October 1, 2007; 15(10): 577 - 587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. Innocenti, L. Delcroix, M. Manfrini, M. Ceruso, and R. Capanna
Vascularized Proximal Fibular Epiphyseal Transfer for Distal Radial Reconstruction
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2004; 86(7): 1504 - 1511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]