This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lewallen, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, L. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lewallen, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, L. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 66, Issue 8 1211-1218, Copyright © 1984 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Polycentric total knee arthroplasty. A ten-year follow-up study

DG Lewallen, RS Bryan and LF Peterson

After review of the first 209 polycentric total knee arthroplasties (in 159 patients) performed at the Mayo Clinic between July 1970 and November 1971, we found that the calculated probability of the arthroplasty remaining successful ten years postoperatively was 66 per cent. Actual results showed 42 per cent of the arthroplasties to be successful in patients who were still alive at review; another 24 per cent were successful but were in patients who had died or were lost to follow-up before ten years postoperatively. In 34 per cent failure occurred, which we defined as reoperation for any reason, unacceptable pain, or loss of function. The most common causes of failure were instability or ligament laxity (13 per cent), loosening of a component (7 per cent), infection (3 per cent), and patellofemoral joint pain (4 per cent). Prior knee surgery significantly decreased the probability of success, as did axial malalignment of the prosthetic components at operation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. Q. Dutton, S.-J. Yeo, K.-Y. Yang, N.-N. Lo, K.-U. Chia, and H.-C. Chong
Computer-Assisted Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared with Standard Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Prospective, Randomized Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2008; 90(1): 2 - 9.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
B. R. HAMLIN, G. P. DUFFY, R. T. TROUSDALE, and B. F. MORREY
Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 1998; 80(1): 76 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]