This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilber, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Nash, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilber, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Nash, C. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 66, Issue 8 1178-1187, Copyright © 1984 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc

JOURNAL CONTENTS

Postoperative neurological deficits in segmental spinal instrumentation. A study using spinal cord monitoring

RG Wilber, GH Thompson, JW Shaffer, RH Brown and CL Nash

We retrospectively analyzed the postoperative neurological complications in 137 patients who underwent a posterior spine fusion for scoliosis and had concomitant somatosensory cortical evoked-potential spinal-cord monitoring. The patients were divided into three specific operative groups: group 1, forty-nine patients who had a Harrington rod with segmental wiring (segmental spinal instrumentation); group 2, twenty patients who had Luque segmental spinal instrumentation; and group 3, sixty-eight patients who had a Harrington rod without segmental spinal instrumentation. There were neurological complications in twelve (17 per cent) of the sixty-nine patients in groups 1 and 2. Three patients (4 per cent) had a major injury to the spinal cord and nine patients (13 per cent) had only transient sensory changes. No difference was apparent between group 1 and group 2 in the degree of operative correction of curves or in the incidence of neurological complications. The one neurological complication (1.5 per cent) that occurred in the sixty-eight patients in group 3 was a Brown-Sequard syndrome. The factors related to increased risk for spinal cord injury in groups 1 and 2 included: (1) the passage of sublaminar wires in the thoracic and thoracolumbar spine, (2) intraoperative correction exceeding the preoperative bending correction, and (3) the surgeon's lack of adequate experience with the technique. With spinal cord monitoring we were able to predict the impending major neurological deficits, but the transient (sensory) changes that may be associated with segmental wiring were less reliably predicted.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JBJSHome page
V. POTENZA, S. L. WEINSTEIN, and J. G. NEYT
Dysfunction of the Spinal Cord During Spinal Arthrodesis for Scoliosis: Recommendations for Early Detection and Treatment. A Case Report
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 1998; 80(11): 1679 - 83.
[Full Text]