This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ewald, F. C.
Right arrow Articles by Sledge, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ewald, F. C.
Right arrow Articles by Sledge, C. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 66, Issue 7 1032-1040, Copyright © 1984 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Kinematic total knee replacement

FC Ewald, MA Jacobs, RE Miegel, PS Walker, R Poss and CB Sledge

We reviewed 124 consecutive kinematic condylar total knee replacements (in ninety-one patients) at two to four years postoperatively. One hundred and eleven (90 per cent) were rated as good or excellent. The average active postoperative flexion was 106 degrees (range, 94 to 120 degrees). Twenty-two knees (18 per cent) had incomplete, non-progressive radiolucent lines, less than one millimeter in width, at the tibial bone-cement interface; these were considered insignificant. Restriction of stair-climbing ability in this series appeared to be a function of involvement of multiple joints rather than of patellar replacement, as the rheumatoid patients with resurfaced patellae performed the worst. The osteoarthritic patients with involvement of a single joint performed the best, regardless of whether the patella was resurfaced or not. When compared with a similar series of total knee replacements in which the tibial component was made entirely of plastic, less reaction at the bone-cement interface was found with the metal-backed kinematic tibial component. We suggest that this finding is clinical confirmation of in vitro studies that demonstrated the advantage of metal-backed tibial components. We concluded that this procedure, if meticulously performed, will give predictably good to excellent results with a low complication rate, a good postoperative range of motion, and a favorable-appearing bone-cement interface at two to four years.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
S. Sharma, F. Nicol, M. G. Hullin, and S. W. McCreath
Long-term results of the uncemented Low Contact Stress total knee replacement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
J Bone Joint Surg Br, August 1, 2005; 87-B(8): 1077 - 1080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. D. Hanssen, M. J. Stuart, R. D. Scott, and G. R. Scuderi
Surgical Options for the Middle-Aged Patient with Osteoarthritis of the Knee Joint*{{dagger}}
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2000; 82(12): 1767 - 1767.
[Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. R. DIDUCH, J. N. INSALL, W. N. SCOTT, G. R. SCUDERI, and D. FONT-RODRIGUEZ
Total Knee Replacement in Young, Active Patients. Long-Term Follow-up and Functional Outcome
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 1997; 79(4): 575 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text]