This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tullos, H.
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tullos, H.
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, J
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 66, Issue 6 888-898, Copyright © 1984 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc

JOURNAL CONTENTS

Total hip arthroplasty with a low-modulus porous-coated femoral component

HS Tullos, BL McCaskill, R Dickey and J Davidson

Fifty-seven patients had sixty-three total hip replacements, performed using a femoral stem with a soft, low-modulus porous coating of Proplast and a conventional acrylic-cemented acetabular component. Forty-seven of the hips were followed for an average of thirty-seven months. Seventeen (36 per cent) of the forty-seven hips were judged to be clinical failures, and five of the failures were revised by inserting a new femoral component and fixing it with acrylic cement. The prostheses were thought to have failed because they had inadequate support, due to deficiencies in the design of the stem and in the fit of the implant in the femur. The five retrieved prostheses were found to have fibrous-tissue ingrowth into the coating, which had failed by shear within its substance. Therefore, we concluded that the coating had insufficient strength to withstand normal weight-bearing loads. To improve performance, a more stable prosthesis with a stronger porous coating is needed. In addition, a posterior surgical approach through a transtrochanteric osteotomy may give better exposure of the femoral canal and facilitate the use of longer-stem (140 to 153-millimeter) designs, which are less likely to be inserted in a varus position.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JBJSHome page
S. Akhavan, M. M. Matthiesen, L. Schulte, T. Penoyar, M. J. Kraay, C. M. Rimnac, and V. M. Goldberg
Clinical and Histologic Results Related to a Low-Modulus Composite Total Hip Replacement Stem
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2006; 88(6): 1308 - 1314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]