This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wehbe, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, L. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wehbe, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, L. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 66, Issue 5 658-669, Copyright © 1984 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Mallet fractures

MA Wehbe and LH Schneider

In a review of 160 mallet fingers, forty-four were found to have a fracture of the distal phalanx. Of these mallet fractures, twenty-one could be followed for a mean of 3.25 years (range, six months to eight years). Six had been treated surgically and fifteen had simply been splinted. Of these twenty-one mallet fractures, all but one had a good result irrespective of the form of treatment. Bone-remodeling occurred in all digits (including two with fibrous union), with reconstitution of the articular surface and preservation of the joint space as seen on radiographs. There was also a near-normal range of painless motion in all but one finger. Poor patient compliance was an occasional difficulty when conservative treatment was used. Surgical treatment was difficult and unreliable; it offered no advantage over conservative treatment and had a greater rate of morbidity. The major "complication" of both forms of treatment was a bone prominence on the dorsum of the distal interphalangeal joint. These findings suggest that most mallet fractures can be treated conservatively, ignoring joint subluxation and the size and amount of displacement of the bone fragment.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
A. A. Bendre, B. J. Hartigan, and D. M. Kalainov
Mallet Finger
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., September 1, 2005; 13(5): 336 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
H. Degroot III and D. P. Mass
Hand injury patterns in softball players using a 16 inch ball
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 1988; 16(3): 260 - 265.
[Abstract] [PDF]