This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blair, W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Buckwalter, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blair, W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Buckwalter, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 66, Issue 3 365-370, Copyright © 1984 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Metacarpophalangeal joint implant arthroplasty with a Silastic spacer

WF Blair, DG Shurr and JA Buckwalter

We evaluated Silastic implant arthroplasty in the metacarpophalangeal joints of rheumatoid patients by a prospective analysis of the cases of twenty-eight patients. One hundred and fifteen such implants were followed for an average of fifty-four months (range, twenty-four to 125 months). The postoperative active motion of the metacarpophalangeal joint averaged 43 degrees, from 13 degrees of extension to 56 degrees of flexion. The average range of active motion of the metacarpophalangeal joint increased 17 degrees over preoperative values. Ulnar drift recurred in forty-nine fingers (43 per cent), and fracture of the spacer occurred in twenty-four joints (21 per cent). The sites of three spacers became infected, and treatment required the amputation of one finger. Preoperative and postoperative key pinch and grip strengths were unchanged. Patient satisfaction was high; twenty patients (71 per cent) experienced significant pain relief, nineteen patients (68 per cent) felt that they had much better hand function, and twenty-three patients (82 per cent) thought that the cosmetic appearance of the hand was improved.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
T. D. Rozental
Reconstruction of the Rheumatoid Thumb
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., February 1, 2007; 15(2): 118 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. Chiari, K. Trieb, C. A. Goldfarb, and P. J. Stern
Metacarpophalangeal Joint Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis * C.A. Goldfarb and P.J. Stern reply
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2004; 86(8): 1832 - 1833.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. A. Goldfarb and P. J. Stern
Metacarpophalangeal Joint Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Long-Term Assessment
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2003; 85(10): 1869 - 1878.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
P. M. Murray
New-Generation Implant Arthroplasties of the Finger Joints
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., September 1, 2003; 11(5): 295 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
J. A. Abboud, P. K. Beredjiklian, and D. J. Bozentka
Metacarpophalangeal Joint Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., May 1, 2003; 11(3): 184 - 191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. D. COOK, R. D. BECKENBAUGH, J. REDONDO, L. S. POPICH, J. J. KLAWITTER, and R. L. LINSCHEID
Long-Term Follow-up of Pyrolytic Carbon Metacarpophalangeal Implants
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 1999; 81(5): 635 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text]