This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amstutz, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Yale, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Amstutz, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Yale, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 66, Issue 2 228-241, Copyright © 1984 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc

JOURNAL CONTENTS

Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty

HC Amstutz, BJ Thomas, R Jinnah, W Kim, T Grogan and C Yale

Of 285 total hip arthroplasties (260 patients) performed for primary osteoarthritis during a six-year period, 135 were resurfaced using a Tharies prosthesis (total hip articular replacement with internal eccentric shells) and 150 were treated with the Trapezoidal-28 total hip replacement. From each of these two groups 100 hips (ninety-one patients in the Tharies group and eighty-six in the Trapezoidal-28 group) that had been followed for two to seven years were evaluated at the time of follow-up in accordance with a predetermined protocol. The patients were younger in the Tharies than in the Trapezoidal-28 group (average ages, fifty-eight and sixty-six years), included more men (sixty compared with thirty-five), and were more active postoperatively. The average follow-up was forty-seven months for the total joint-replacement group and thirty-eight months for the surface replacement group. At follow-up the ratings for pain, walking, and function according to the University of California at Los Angeles 10-point scale and the clinical results were identical in the two groups. Heterotopic ossification (Brooker grade III or IV) developed after thirteen Trapezoidal-28 and twenty-two Tharies arthroplasties. Radiographs made at six and twelve months and at final follow-up showed that the incidence of radiolucencies about the acetabular component was higher in the resurfacing group: fifty-seven with complete radiolucent lines after an average follow-up of thirty-eight months compared with thirty-six with complete lines after an average follow-up of forty-seven months. There were three failures in the joint-replacement group: a hematogenous staphylococcal deep infection that required a Girdlestone procedure, a femoral stem fracture that required revision, and loosening of an acetabular component for which revision was performed. There was also one dislocation, successfully treated by closed reduction. Similarly, in the resurfacing group there were three failures: two loose acetabular components, revised successfully, and one loose femoral component that necessitated total joint arthroplasty. Multivariate stepwise regression analysis showed that the factors that affected the final extent and width of the acetabular radiolucencies adversely after resurfacing were: any radiolucent lines that were visible at six months, a high level of physical activity after arthroplasty, and a thin superior cement mantle.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JBJSHome page
A. Shimmin, P. E. Beaule, and P. Campbell
Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2008; 90(3): 637 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
M. J. Le Duff, H. C. Amstutz, and F. J. Dorey
Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing for Obese Patients
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2007; 89(12): 2705 - 2711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
S. T. Ball, M. J. Le Duff, and H. C. Amstutz
Early Results of Conversion of a Failed Femoral Component in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2007; 89(4): 735 - 741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
P. E. Beaule, M. J. Le Duff, and E. Zaragoza
Quality of Life Following Femoral Head-Neck Osteochondroplasty for Femoroacetabular Impingement
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2007; 89(4): 773 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
H. C. Amstutz, J. T. Antoniades, and M. J. Le Duff
Results of Metal-on-Metal Hybrid Hip Resurfacing for Crowe Type-I and II Developmental Dysplasia
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2007; 89(2): 339 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
K. J. Hendricks and W. H. Harris
High Placement of Noncemented Acetabular Components in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Concise Follow-Up, at a Minimum of Fifteen Years, of a Previous Report
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2006; 88(10): 2231 - 2236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
T. C. B. Pollard, R. P. Baker, S. J. Eastaugh-Waring, and G. C. Bannister
Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip: A FIVE- TO SEVEN-YEAR COMPARISON OF HYBRID TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY AND METAL-ON-METAL RESURFACING
J Bone Joint Surg Br, May 1, 2006; 88-B(5): 592 - 600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
K. J. Hendricks and W. H. Harris
Revision of Failed Acetabular Components with Use of So-Called Jumbo Noncemented Components. A Concise Follow-Up of a Previous Report
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2006; 88(3): 559 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
J. M. Loughead, I. Starks, D. Chesney, J. N. S. Matthews, A. W. McCaskie, and J. P. Holland
Removal of acetabular bone in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: A COMPARISON WITH HYBRID TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY
J Bone Joint Surg Br, January 1, 2006; 88-B(1): 31 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
K. O'Shea, J. F. Quinlan, S. Kutty, D. Mulcahy, and O. H. Brady
The use of uncemented extensively porous-coated femoral components in the management of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures
J Bone Joint Surg Br, December 1, 2005; 87-B(12): 1617 - 1621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
K. J. Saleh, K. J. Mulhall, B. Bershadsky, H. M. Ghomrawi, L. E. White, C. M. Buyea, and K. A. Krackow
Development and Validation of a Lower-Extremity Activity Scale. Use for Patients Treated with Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2005; 87(9): 1985 - 1994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
J. M. Loughead, D. Chesney, J. P. Holland, and A. W. McCaskie
Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty
J Bone Joint Surg Br, February 1, 2005; 87-B(2): 163 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
P. E. Beaule, J. L. Lee, M. J. Le Duff, H. C. Amstutz, and E. Ebramzadeh
Orientation of the Femoral Component in Surface Arthroplasty of the Hip. A Biomechanical and Clinical Analysis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2004; 86(9): 2015 - 2021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
P. E. Beaule, E. Ebramzadeh, M. LeDuff, R. Prasad, and H. C. Amstutz
Cementing a Liner into a Stable Cementless Acetabular Shell: The Double-Socket Technique
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2004; 86(5): 929 - 934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
C. Heisel, M. Silva, M. A. dela Rosa, and T. P. Schmalzried
Short-Term in Vivo Wear of Cross-Linked Polyethylene
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2004; 86(4): 748 - 751.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
H. C. Amstutz, P. E. Beaule, F. J. Dorey, M. J. Le Duff, P. A. Campbell, and T. A. Gruen
Metal-on-Metal Hybrid Surface Arthroplasty: Two to Six-Year Follow-up Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2004; 86(1): 28 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
M. Silva, K. H. Lee, C. Heisel, M. A. dela Rosa, and T. P. Schmalzried
The Biomechanical Results of Total Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2004; 86(1): 40 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
P. E. Beaule, M. J. LeDuff, F. J. Dorey, and H. C. Amstutz
Fate of Cementless Acetabular Components Retained During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2003; 85(12): 2288 - 2293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
W. Brodner, P. Bitzan, V. Meisinger, A. Kaider, F. Gottsauner-Wolf, and R. Kotz
Serum Cobalt Levels After Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2003; 85(11): 2168 - 2173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
F. J. Dorey and H. C. Amstutz
The Need to Account for Patient Activity When Evaluating the Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty with Survivorship Analysis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2002; 84(5): 709 - 710.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
P. E. Beaule, T. P. Schmalzried, P. Udomkiat, and H. C. Amstutz
Jumbo Femoral Head for the Treatment of Recurrent Dislocation Following Total Hip Replacement
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2002; 84(2): 256 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
K. J. URE, H. C. AMSTUTZ, S. NASSER, and T. P. SCHMALZRIED
Direct-Exchange Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Infection after Total Hip Replacement. An Average Ten-Year Follow-up
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 1998; 80(7): 961 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text]