This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tarr, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sarmiento, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tarr, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sarmiento, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 66, Issue 1 65-70, Copyright © 1984 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

The effects of angular and rotational deformities of both bones of the forearm. An in vitro study

RR Tarr, AI Garfinkel and A Sarmiento

In intact fresh cadaver specimens, we experimentally studied angular and rotatory deformities at the distal and middle levels of the forearm. The remaining pronation and supination motions were measured. When both bones of the forearm were angulated with a combined deformity (radio-ulnar or dorsovolar, or both) of 10 degrees, a loss of pronation-supination of 12.5 +/- 4.5 per cent occurred in the forearms with a distal-third fracture; in the forearms with a middle-third fracture the average loss was 16.0 +/- 5.7 per cent. Pronation losses were similar for both distal and middle-third deformities. However, supination losses were much less affected (p less than 0.01) in forearms with deformities at the distal-third level while the losses were considered drastic for middle-third deformities. Rotatory deformities produced losses of pronation-supination that were equal to the degree of deformity. Clinical Relevance: Study of the artificially created deformities in cadavera indicated that angular and rotatory deformities of the forearm of 10 degrees or less result in minimum limitation of pronation-supination. These degrees of limitation of motion in clinical practice are easily compensated for and are cosmetically acceptable. The fact that the perfect anatomical restoration of fracture alignment that often is obtained with internal fixation does not always result in complete restoration of motion suggests that: (1) this residual impairment of function is due to soft-tissue scarring, and (2) the mild angular and rotatory deformities resulting from nonsurgical treatment of fractures of the forearm may produce limitations of motion of an equally acceptable degree.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. E. Dumont, C. W.A. Pfirrmann, D. Ziegler, and L. Nagy
Assessment of Radial and Ulnar Torsion Profiles with Cross-Sectional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. A Study of Volunteers
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2006; 88(7): 1582 - 1588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
C. A. Goldfarb, W. M. Ricci, F. Tull, D. Ray, and J. Borrelli Jr
Functional outcome after fracture of both bones of the forearm
J Bone Joint Surg Br, March 1, 2005; 87-B(3): 374 - 379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. C. Tynan, S. Fornalski, P. J. McMahon, A. Utkan, S. A. Gree, and T. Q. Lee
The Effects of Ulnar Axial Malalignment on Supination and Pronation
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2000; 82(12): 1726 - 1726.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. R. RICHARDS
Current Concepts Review - Chronic Disorders of the Forearm
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 1996; 78(6): 916 - 30.
[Full Text]