This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Savini, R.
Right arrow Articles by Picci, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Savini, R.
Right arrow Articles by Picci, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 65, Issue 9 1283-1289, Copyright © 1983 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Surgical treatment of giant-cell tumor of the spine. The experience at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

R Savini, F Gherlinzoni, M Morandi, JR Neff and P Picci

We reviewed the cases of nine patients with a giant-cell tumor of the vertebrae. All segments of the spine can be affected by the tumor, but there was a predilection for the lumbar segments in our series. Pain was present in all patients. The maximum duration before the diagnosis was made was three years and the minimum, forty-five days (average, 12.2 months). In six patients a neural deficit was also present. One patient was treated many years ago by radiation therapy alone; three patients were treated by decompressive laminectomy; two, by excision of the lesion and postoperative radiation therapy; and three patients underwent lesional but extensive excision as well as arthrodesis without any preoperative or postoperative radiation therapy. We have obtained good results with the latter treatment; after follow-ups of sixty, twenty-six, and twenty-four months in three patients the pain and the neural symptoms subsided, while roentgenographic examination showed no evidence of local recurrence. In all patients the autogenous bone grafts appeared to be incorporated, without any secondary deformity. We concluded that, due to the development of better surgical techniques, the surgical approach is probably the best modern treatment for a giant-cell tumor located in the spine.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?