This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simon, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sledge, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simon, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sledge, C. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 65, Issue 5 605-613, Copyright © 1983 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Quantitative gait analysis after total knee arthroplasty for monarticular degenerative arthritis

SR Simon, HW Trieshmann, RG Burdett, FC Ewald and CB Sledge

By quantitative gait analysis, we characterized the functional results of total knee arthroplasty in a group of twelve elderly patients with isolated degenerative arthritis of one knee. All patients had had a standard replacement arthroplasty performed at least two years before the study. In the gait analysis we used high-speed movie cameras synchronized with force platforms and electromyograms to provide kinetic and kinematic data. The data were compared with those obtained from an age-matched control group. In the patients most of the measurements of gait had been restored to normal levels. These measurements included: velocity; stride length; arcs of motion of the hip, knee, and ankle bilaterally; phasic muscle activity; and the amount of mechanical work performed. There were three patterns of external torque across the implants and in the control knee which were comparable in magnitude but varied in relative frequency between the two groups. As compared with the controls, the patients spent approximately 30 per cent more time in double-limb stance and had prolonged cycle times. These findings may have been the result of muscle weakness, neural impairment, or habit, but the cause could not be determined by this study.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?