This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Floman, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Floman, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, J. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 64, Issue 9 1307-1316, Copyright © 1982 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Osteotomy of the fusion mass in scoliosis

Y Floman, JN Penny, LJ Micheli, EJ Riseborough and JE Hall

The value of an osteotomy of the fusion mass in attaining realignment of the spine when a lateral shift of the trunk over the pelvis has developed in the frontal plane was studied in fifty-five patients. All had had a previously fused but progressive spinal deformity. The indications for osteotomy were progression of the curve, imbalance of the trunk, pain, deteriorating cardiopulmonary function, or pseudarthrosis, or a combination of these conditions. Twenty-one patients had idiopathic scoliosis; fourteen, congenital scoliosis; ten, paralytic scoliosis; four, myelodysplastic scoliosis; and six had scoliosis secondary to miscellaneous conditions. A total of 154 osteotomies of the fusion mass, or 2.8 osteotomies per patient, were performed. Nine patients underwent an anterior spinal osteotomy or wedge resection as well. Most had a two-stage procedure which consisted of a posterior osteotomy, halo-femoral traction, and a posterior re-fusion with Harrington instrumentation two weeks later. At an average follow-up of thirty-two months, it was found that osteotomy of the fusion mass enabled the surgeon to realign the trunk over the pelvis and to correct pelvis obliquity, but correction of the angular deformity was only secondary. Although the rate of complications was high (51 per cent, including one postoperative death), osteotomy of the fusion mass and re-fusion may be indicated in a patient with a previously fused but progressively unbalanced, painful deformity of the spine.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. J. Sucato, D. Hedequist, and L. A. Karol
Operative Correction of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in Male Patients. A Radiographic and Functional Outcome Comparison With Female Patients
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2004; 86(9): 2005 - 2014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. M. Campbell Jr., M. D. Smith, T. C. Mayes, J. A. Mangos, D. B. Willey-Courand, N. Kose, R. F. Pinero, M. E. Alder, H. L. Duong, and J. L. Surber
The Effect of Opening Wedge Thoracostomy on Thoracic Insufficiency Syndrome Associated with Fused Ribs and Congenital Scoliosis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2004; 86(8): 1659 - 1674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. H. Bridwell, S. J. Lewis, L. G. Lenke, C. Baldus, and K. Blanke
Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy for the Treatment of Fixed Sagittal Imbalance
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 11, 2003; 85(3): 454 - 463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]