This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Millar, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Millar, E. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 64, Issue 9 1282-1294, Copyright © 1982 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Orthopaedic management of lumbosacral agenesis. Long-term follow-up

WA Phillips, DR Cooperman, TC Lindquist, RC Sullivan and EA Millar

Twenty-two patients with lumbosacral agenesis were treated at the Shriners Hospital for Crippled Children, Chicago Unit, from 1953 to 1979. At the time of this study, ten of the patients were skeletally mature after an average follow-up of 24.1 years. Two patients had died, twelve could be examined, and eight who were unable to return for examination responded to a questionnaire. Eleven of the patients had diabetic mothers. Of the orthopaedic problems in these patients, knee-flexion contractures with popliteal webbing were the most difficult to correct. These deformities varied in severity with the level of the agenesis and the resulting loss of motor power. Other problems were dislocations and flexions contractures of the hips, scoliosis, equinovarus deformities of the foot, and instability at the spinal-pelvic junction. When there was inadequate quadriceps function it was difficult to correct knee-flexion contractures and to prevent them from recurring. For severe knee deformity, knee disarticulation and prosthetic fitting were the most effective treatment. Spinal-pelvic instability was not a problem in eighteen of the twenty surviving patients. Unreduced dislocated hips also did not cause any problems.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. T. Guille, R. Benevides, C. C. DeAlba, V. Siriram, and S. J. Kumar
Lumbosacral Agenesis: A New Classification Correlating Spinal Deformity and Ambulatory Potential
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2002; 84(1): 32 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text]