This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeOrio, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Bianco, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DeOrio, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Bianco, A. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 64, Issue 7 991-996, Copyright © 1982 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Lumbar disc excision in children and adolescents

JK DeOrio and AJ Bianco

Fifty patients, all of whom were sixteen years old or younger, underwent discectomy for a herniated lumbar disc at the Mayo Clinic between 1950 and 1976. Ninety-four per cent of the patients had had excellent or good initial relief of symptoms after the initial operation. Subsequently, however, twenty-eight of the thirty-seven patients who initially had undergone disc excision only required additional treatment for low-back pain or sciatica. Twelve of them required a second operation, consisting of nine discectomies (six with a concomitant spine fusion), two spine fusions alone, and one re-fusion. Of the thirty-seven patients who initially had had disc excision alone, three had a recurrent disc protrusion and five had a disc protrusion at another level. Of sixteen patients who had had multiple subtotal hemilaminectomies at the initial operation, either for involvement of multiple discs or for exploration, seven required reoperation. In the twelve patients who had had both a disc excision and a lumbar spine fusion as the initial operation, there were no recurrent disc protrusions and only one patient had a protrusion at another level. Follow-up on all patients ranged from five to thirty years (average, nineteen years). Ninety per cent of the patients stated that the condition of the back had little or no effect on their current way of life, despite the presence of continuing back complaints in some. However, we rated the results of the initial discectomy at follow-up as excellent or good in 73.5 per cent and poor in 26.5 per cent of the patients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. J. PAPAGELOPOULOS, W. J. SHAUGHNESSY, M. J. EBERSOLD, A. J. BIANCO, and L. M. QUAST
Long-Term Outcome of Lumbar Discectomy in Children and Adolescents Sixteen Years of Age or Younger
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 1998; 80(5): 689 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. Fujita, M. Shinmei, K. Hashimoto, and Y. Shimomura
Posterior dislocation of the sacral apophyseal ring: A case report
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 1986; 14(3): 243 - 245.
[PDF]