This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, A. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 64, Issue 5 766-771, Copyright © 1982 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Elevation of the insertion of the patellar ligament for patellofemoral pain

AB Ferguson

In an effort to evaluate the use of a transverse incision and a relatively small elevation (1.25 centimeters) of the tendinous insertion of the patellar ligament into the tibial tubercle, 184 patients were treated with a modified procedure using the Maquet principle. The indications for the procedure were patellofemoral pain and loss of active function. The patients were placed in five groups based on the cause of their symptoms: chondromalacia, patellofemoral arthritis, patellar dislocation, previous trauma, and previous patellectomy. The results were evaluated on the basis of whether or not primary wound-healing was satisfactory and whether or not the patient resumed the ability to ascend stairs and could engage in previously lost athletic function, Eighty-five per cent of the patients achieved these goals of treatment. The disadvantages of the procedure appeared to be the slow return of full function (averaging six months), prominence of the area of the tibial tubercle, and persistence of crepitus on patellofemoral motion.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
E. K. Nam and R. P. Karzel
Mini-Open Medial Reefing and Arthroscopic Lateral Release for the Treatment of Recurrent Patellar Dislocation: A Medium-Term Follow-up
Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2005; 33(2): 220 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
A. J. Cosgarea, M. D. Schatzke, A. K. Seth, and A. S. Litsky
Biomechanical Analysis of Flat and Oblique Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy for Recurrent Patellar Instability
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1999; 27(4): 507 - 512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
R. J. Naranja JR, P.J. Reilly, J. R. Kuhlman, E. Haut, and J. S. Torg
Long-Term Evaluation of the Elmslie-Trillat-Maquet Procedure for Patellofemoral Dysfunction
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1996; 24(6): 779 - 784.
[Abstract] [PDF]