This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lew, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lew, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, J. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 64, Issue 5 734-739, Copyright © 1982 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

The effect of knee-prosthesis geometry on cruciate ligament mechanics during flexion

WD Lew and JL Lewis

We used buckle transducers in conjunction with a mathematical model to investigate the mechanics of the cruciate ligaments during flexion of knees containing prostheses with differing component geometries. With normal component placement and both cruciate ligaments intact, the full range of flexion is restricted in a knee with the conforming, single radius-of-curvature geometric prosthesis because of large constraint forces in the posterior cruciate ligament. Ligament incompatibility is avoided with multicurvature designs, as represented by the kinematic prosthesis. Low conformity of components allows anterior-posterior displacements to accompany flexion, which provides for a full range of flexion and allows cruciate ligament forces to approach those of a normal knee. Clinical Relevance: This analysis points out that special precautions must be taken to avoid ligament constraint forces (and potential loosening) if an implant with highly conforming components is used when both cruciate ligaments are intact. The information presented here, relating implant geometry to cruciate ligament mechanics, must be considered when choosing an appropriate prosthetic design to ensure ligament compatibility in the presence of one, both, or no cruciate ligaments.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
J.-M. CLOUTIER, P. SABOURET, and A. DEGHRAR
Total Knee Arthroplasty with Retention of Both Cruciate Ligaments. A Nine to Eleven-Year Follow-up Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 1999; 81(5): 697 - 702.
[Abstract] [Full Text]