This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greene, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Cary, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greene, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Cary, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 64, Issue 3 438-443, Copyright © 1982 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc

JOURNAL CONTENTS

Partial foot amputations in children. A comparison of the several types with the Syme amputation

WB Greene and JM Cary

We compared the results in fourteen children in whom part of the foot was amputated with the results in a similar group of patients who had a Syme amputation. Based on levels of activity, physical examination, prosthetic requirements, ratio of the length of the fore part of the foot to the hind part, and gait mechanics, we classified the children into three groups. In Group I (patients with a metatarsal ray or transmetatarsal amputation) the results were clearly superior to those in the group with Syme amputation. In Group II (patients with a Lisfranc, mid-tarsal, or Chopart amputation and no equinus contracture) the patients had better over-all function but needed to make greater adjustments for gait than did those with a Syme amputation. In Group III (patients with a Chopart amputation who had an equinus contracture and inadequate length of the fore part of the foot) the results were clearly inferior to those of patients with a Syme amputation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
E. Sobel, C. J. Japour, R. J. Giorgini, S. J. Levitz, and H. L. Richardson
Use of Prostheses and Footwear in 110 Inner-City Partial-Foot Amputees
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, January 1, 2001; 91(1): 34 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
T. FULP, J. R. DAVIDS, L. C. MEYER, and D. W. BLACKHURST
Longitudinal Deficiency of the Fibula. Operative Treatment
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 1996; 78(5): 674 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text]