This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gelberman, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Urbaniak, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gelberman, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Urbaniak, J. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 64, Issue 3 383-387, Copyright © 1982 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

The results of radial and ulnar arterial repair in the forearm. Experience in three medical centers

RH Gelberman, JA Nunley, LA Koman, JS Gould, PT Hergenroeder, CR MacClean and JR Urbaniak

Sixty-two patients with ninety injuries to the radial or the ulnar artery, or to both of these arteries, had arterial repairs using microvascular techniques in three medical centers. Twenty-six of the twenty-eight patients who had an ischemic hand secondary to injuries to both arteries and a successful operative repair had at least on patent vessel at follow-up. Of the other two patients, one had an amputation through the forearm for ischemia of the hand and the other had a viable hand supplied by collateral vessels, although both the radial and the ulnar arteries were thrombosed. The over-all success rate for all repairs was 54 per cent. After 47 per cent of the one-artery and 57 per cent of the two-artery lacerations, the vessels were patent at follow-up. Repairs of acute sharp transections of the radial artery within thirty-six hours of injury were most successful. Of the factors other than operative technique that strongly influence vessel patency after repair, back pressure in the distal arterial stump and the extent of the ischemia of the hand relative to its normal blood supply (a function of the completeness of the palmar arch) appear to be the most important.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
C. S. Phillips and M. S. Murphy
Vascular Problems of the Upper Extremity: A Primer for the Orthopaedic Surgeon
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., November 1, 2002; 10(6): 401 - 408.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
G. L. Porubsky, S. I. Brown, and J. R. Urbaniak
Ulnar artery thrombosis: A sports-related injury
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1986; 14(2): 170 - 175.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
J. S. Urse, F. J. Auwers, and L. Posevitz
Brachial Artery Transsection after Closed Elbow Dislocation A Case Report and Review of the Literature
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, July 1, 1985; 19(4): 247 - 251.
[Abstract] [PDF]